My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-06-1999 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
10-06-1999 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:37:58 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:37:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
10/6/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 6, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> 4110 Commissioner Miller inquired if the last sentence of Page 3 of the Resolution should end with the <br /> word "typical," and the phrase"arguably uniform in appearance" be omitted. Ericson stated staff <br /> would delete the words following the word "typical." Commissioner Miller further inquired if <br /> language should be included on Page 4, Item 3 of the resolution to indicate that the existing shed <br /> would be removed. Ericson stated that a building permit would not be issued unless the existing <br /> shed was removed. <br /> Commissioner Miller inquired if there was a time frame for the removal of the existing shed. <br /> Ericson pointed out that it would be necessary for the applicant to remove the existing shed prior <br /> to constructing the proposed structure, as it is to be constructed in the same location. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Kaden. To Approve Resolution No. 595-99, a Resolution <br /> Recommending Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Allow For an Oversized Shed for Alan <br /> and Tammy Doroff, 8270 Eastwood Road, Mounds View Planning Case No. 571-99, as <br /> amended. <br /> Ayes— 7 Nays— 0 The motion carried. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated this item would be before the Council for a public hearing at <br /> the October 25, 1999 City Council meeting. <br /> • 7. Discuss options for amending the City Code to allow for driveways wider than 35 feet. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated at the September 1, 1999 Planning Commission meeting, a <br /> resident of the City had approached the Commission to request a variance to allow for a 44-foot <br /> driveway. The City Code currently prohibits a driveway in excess of 35 feet. He stated staff was <br /> directed to conduct research in this regard, and after surveying a number of neighboring <br /> communities, determined that Mounds View's requirements are on the more restrictive end of the <br /> spectrum in terms of the maximum width of driveways and curb cuts. <br /> • •. - •- e - - � - • ♦ -- - .• ; --- • -■ • : • i -- . -- , <br /> and only one other city, Arden Hills, requires a curb cut that narrow. Other communities require <br /> between 24 and 28 feet, and the city of Blaine allows 30 feet at the street. He explained that most <br /> of the communities surveyed did not have a requirement in terms of the width driveways. Some <br /> communities restrict the width of driveways in relation to a percentage of lot width, one <br /> community requires the driveway be no wider than the garage, and another community requires <br /> that the impervious surface coverage of the lot can not exceed 40 percent. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated staff is requesting direction to revise the City's 35-foot width <br /> requirement, to reflect more current times in which three-car garages are the norm. He explained <br /> that the Code was written during a time when single car garages were the standard, and it does <br /> 1111 not appear unreasonable to staff to amend the Code to allow for wider driveways. He stated staff <br /> has proposed language which indicates "the lot width, driveways or parking areas shall not exceed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.