My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-20-1999 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
10-20-1999 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:38:46 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:38:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
10/20/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 20, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> ! Commissioner Stevenson inquired regarding the nature of the maps. Community Development <br /> Director Jopke explained that Page 5 of the draft contains a list, which indicates the types of maps <br /> contained within the document. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke indicated at the first study session, the Commission should <br /> discuss what type of community input is appropriate. He explained there would be at least one <br /> informational community forum,for presentation of the document, and a more formal public hearing, <br /> during which the citizens will provide their input. He pointed out that the Metropolitan Council <br /> requires the City's Comprehensive Plan is made available for the review of adjacent communities, and <br /> this should be done at the earliest point in the process. <br /> Chair Peterson inquired if the adjacent communities' Comprehensive Plans were also subject to an <br /> extension period. Community Development Director explained the plans were all in various stages <br /> of the process, however, fairly close to that of Mounds View. He added that the Comprehensive Plan <br /> for the cities of New Brighton, Shoreview, Arden Hills, and Blaine have already been submitted to <br /> staff. <br /> Chair Peterson inquired if any conflicts or incompatibilities were indicated in the plans that had been <br /> submitted. Community Development Director Jopke stated he was not aware of any. <br /> Commissioner Hegland inquired if staff would present any of the data through graphs. He pointed <br /> out the draft contained many charts, however, graphs may offer further clarification of the <br /> information. Community Development Director Jopke stated staff would attempt to utilize any means <br /> to better communicate this information. <br /> Chair Peterson inquired if sufficient room would be available for the study session. Community <br /> Development Director Jopke indicated the conference room would be available for this meeting. <br /> Chair Peterson suggested the Commissioners skim through the entire document, to see how it flows <br /> and fits together, and get into more detail, and decide what they would like to proceed at the study <br /> session. <br /> B. Previous Council Actions <br /> No previous Council actions were considered. <br /> 8. Chairperson and Planning Commissioners Report <br /> No reports were considered. <br /> 9. Adjournment <br /> There being no further business before the Planning Commission, Chairperson Peterson adjourned <br /> 110 the meeting at 8:09 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.