11-03-1999 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission November 3, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 5 • Commissioner Hegland stated the median was somewhat inconsequential in that if someone sees an entrance at this location, and are not aware there is an entrance on Mounds View Drive, they will attempt to enter the site from this location. Commissioner Laube stated County Road I was under the jurisdiction of the County, and the City has no control over it. Mr. Pinkerton suggested they start with a sign which indicates "no left turn" at the exit, and if necessary, indicate"no entrance" on the other side of the sign later, and tilt it so it is visible only to traffic coming from the right. Chair Peterson reiterated the earlier stated language of"Right in,right out, with appropriate signage," with the specific details determined either prior to the final approval, or with experience. He noted staff's recommendation to list Item ld as a separate stipulation. Planning Associate Ericson stated lb should also be a separate stipulation indicating"Right in. right out access onto County Road I,with appropriate signage." He stated this would be indicated as the second stipulation,with the third stipulation being the current Item ld, which indicates"Signage shall be in compliance with the City Code and approved conditional use permit." Commissioner Stevenson noted a contingency for additional parking stalls, in the event the facility's parking was found to be inadequate. He stated it appeared this contingency was omitted when the applicant indicated that 31 parking stalls would be provided, and inquired if there was still a • contingency for overflow parking and additional stalls. Planning Associate Ericson explained the applicant has made an arrangement with Silver View Plaza, to utilize the rear of their parking lot in the event of parking overflow. Commissioner Stevenson inquired if there was any possibility of conditional parking on the site in the future, or if the 31 parking stalls are the maximum, even if this was found to be inadequate. Planning Associate Ericson stated he believed the site design utilized as much area as possible for parking spaces. Commissioner Stevenson explained if there was additional room to expand the parking area in the future, he would like to include this contingency in the resolution. Planning Associate Ericson advised if it is discovered during the course of the operation that the parking is not adequate, the conditional use permit can be revisited, and the matter can be brought back before the City Council to be addressed. MOTION/SECOND: Peterson/Kaden. To Approve Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution No. 596-99, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Development Review for a Two-story, 46- Room Senior Assisted Residential Facility Located at 2670 County Road I; Planning Case No. 573- 99, as Amended to Indicate Item lb as Stipulation 2, "Right In, Right Out Access Onto County Road I,with Appropriate Signage," and Item ld as Stipulation 3, "Signage Shall Be in Compliance With the City Code and Approved Conditional Use Permit."