My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1999 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
11-17-1999 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:40:44 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:40:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
11/17/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> • Planning Associate Ericson stated the general requirements considered for a Conditional Use Permit <br /> are outlined in the Staff Report. He advised that the specific requirements indicate the front yard <br /> depth shall be a minimum of thirty-five feet, and this provision is met. He stated another requirement <br /> provides that sideyards shall be no less than thirty feet, and staff believes this provision to be met as <br /> well, however, there is an accessory building on the site which encroaches into the sideyard setback, <br /> and is located 20 feet from the property line. He explained that staff interprets this provision to <br /> address the Church structure, itself, and not any accessory structure. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson noted a specific requirement that the minimum lot area shall be no less <br /> than one acre. He explained the site is approximately 6.4 acres, of which a significant portion is <br /> wetlands and upland woods. He indicated that adequate screening from abutting residential uses and <br /> landscaping is provided, particularly with the presence of the wetland and the woods, in addition to <br /> the mature trees and landscaping on the site. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated there is a requirement that off street parking and access to the site <br /> be provided. He indicated there are 98 parking stalls on the site, which meet the need for the existing <br /> facility, as well as for the expansion, according to the City Code. He noted additional temporary <br /> seating in the worship area might be made available, however, staff believes this does not require to <br /> be further accounted for, in terms of the parking requirements. He pointed out there is sufficient <br /> room on the site to create additional parking if it is determined to be necessary. <br /> 411 Planning Associate Ericson explained the provision pertaining to adequate off street loading and <br /> service entrances is not applicable with this proposal. He advised there is a requirement that the <br /> provisions of Section 1125.01 of the Zoning Code be met. He explained that these provisions pertain <br /> to the adverse affects criteria, which are additionally reviewed with the Conditional Use Permit <br /> request. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated the adverse affects criteria are addressed with this proposal, and <br /> staff believes no adverse affects are presented with this use, or with the expanded area of the Church <br /> facility. He indicated with the location of the site, which is adjacent to three streets, and the <br /> surrounding woodlands and wetlands, the proposed use is sufficiently separated from neighboring <br /> uses. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson explained that with the second part of this request, the Development <br /> Review, there are dimensional requirements that must be met. He advised that all of these <br /> requirements have been met, with the exception of the parking lot setback on the west side of the <br /> property, along Long Lake Road. He provided the Commission with the site plan, which indicates <br /> that the parking lot is approximately two feet from the property line. He explained, however, even <br /> with this, staff believes that all the requirements are met, in that no alterations to the parking lot are <br /> proposed. He advised that the parking lot represents a non-conforming type of use, and unless the <br /> applicant was proposing to redo the parking lot, it is allowed to remain, according to the City Code. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson advised that with the expansion, the applicant would be required to <br /> provide 92 parking stalls, and at present there are 98 parking stalls on the site. He pointed out that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.