Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission December 1, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> 3. Citizens' Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> There were no citizen requests or comments on items not on the agenda. <br /> 4. Approval of Minutes <br /> A. November 3, 1999 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Miller to approve the November 3, 1999 meeting minutes as <br /> corrected. <br /> Ayes—7 Nays—0 The motion carried. <br /> 5. Planning Case No. 574-99 <br /> Property Involved: 7687 Long Lake Road <br /> Consideration of Resolution 598-99 regarding a request for a Conditional Use Permit for Sunrise <br /> United Methodist Church and a Development Review to allow an expansion to the Church <br /> facility. <br /> Applicant: Vanman Companies (Representing Sunrise) <br /> The applicant was present. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: <br /> The applicant, Vanman Companies, representing the property owner, Sunrise United Methodist <br /> Church, is requesting approval of a conditional use permit and development review to allow for <br /> the expansion of their Church facility located at 7687 Long Lake Road. The expanded areas will <br /> serve as additional space within the sanctuary and child care areas, will provide for office space <br /> for the pastor and other church workers, and will add a meeting room and multi-use space for the <br /> staff and congregation. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated the total area of the expansion plan is approximately 7,500 <br /> square feet, which brings the total building area, after expansion, to approximately 20,500 square <br /> feet. He indicated the criteria for approving a conditional use permit for this proposal are all met, <br /> as are the dimensional requirements for the development review. He noted an issue brought <br /> forward at the previous meeting, with regard to the parking lot setback two feet from Long Lake <br /> Road, which was determined at that meeting to simply be non-conforming. He added that as the <br /> applicant was not proposing any alterations to the parking lot at this time, the issue would not be <br /> saddressed with the overall development review or the conditional use permit. <br />