Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission December 1, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> . Commissioner Johnson advised that some of the ponds require to be pumped out during periods <br /> of heavy rain, however, this would be the only expense he could foresee. Chair Peterson <br /> explained that this was true of some of the smaller ponds with no exits. <br /> Chair Peterson inquired regarding the most appropriate wording for Finding No. 11. <br /> Community Development Director Jopke suggested that rather than more specific, the language <br /> be more general, indicating that the Planning Commission desires to insure that this land swap <br /> does not result in additional costs to the City. <br /> Chair Peterson stated this re-wording appears to be appropriate. Commissioner Miller agreed. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson stated clarification of this language is for the benefit of the public, who <br /> would be concerned regarding additional expenses. He indicated this more general language <br /> appears to reflect the intention of the Planning Commission more closely. Commissioner Kaden <br /> agreed. <br /> Commissioner Kaden inquired if the City would see a financial benefit with the proposed land <br /> swap, in addition to obtaining the wetland, or if this was to be determined by the Council, at a <br /> later date. <br /> 4110 Community Development Director Jopke stated ultimately, this would be the City Council's <br /> decision, however, as proposed, it is a straight land swap. He explained that the City would be <br /> giving up 1.5 acres, and gaining 7.4 acres in return. <br /> Commissioner Kaden regarding inquired din the assessed value of both properties involved in the <br /> q g g <br /> proposed land swap. Community Development Director Jopke stated he was uncertain. <br /> Commissioner Hegland stated the Commission could not be certain at this point, whether or not <br /> the City will incur any significant additional expenses due to the land swap, therefore, he would <br /> request language to address this. He explained that his concern is that as the matter proceeds, and <br /> the Council rules on it, they consider this factor. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson inquired if Commissioner Hegland agreed with the suggested re- <br /> wording. Commissioner Hegland stated the suggested language does not appear to raise any <br /> concern at all, and he was not certain he felt comfortable with this. <br /> Chair Peterson advised that this is a preliminary stage in the proposal, and the Commission is <br /> considering the "big picture" issues at this point. He indicated that many small issues will come <br /> forward, however, at this point, the Commission should identify all of the large issues and <br /> incorporate them into the resolution, to provide some feedback to the Council in terms of the <br /> direction of this proposal. <br />