My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-1991
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
03-21-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 6:15:22 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 6:15:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/21/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> 111 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> Pi <br /> n vROV - DtiRegular Meeting <br /> March 6, 1991 <br /> Mounds View City Hall <br /> 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 <br /> The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to 1. Call to Order <br /> order by Chair Mountin at 7 :38 p.m. on Wednesday, <br /> March 6, 1991. <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Colleen, Peterson, 2 . Roll Call <br /> Zollner, and Chair Mountin. <br /> Commissioners Burgers, and Miller had excused <br /> absences . Commissioner Jones had an unexcused <br /> absence. <br /> ALSO PRESENT: Councilmember Blanchard, Planner <br /> Harrington, and City Attorney Barney. <br /> Motion/Second: Zoilner/Colleen to approve the 3 . Approval of <br /> January 2, 1991 and February 6, 1991 minutes as Minutes : <br /> Oresented. January 2 and <br /> February 6, <br /> 1991 <br /> 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> There were no residents requests or comments from the 4 . Residents <br /> floor. Requests and <br /> Comments From <br /> the Floor <br /> Resolution No. 309-91 was reviewed by the Planning 5 . Consideration <br /> Commission. Planner Harrington explained the two of Resolution <br /> points of concerns regarding this case; a 58 foot No. 309-91 <br /> front yard setback is required for the lot by a Regarding <br /> previous planning action and a 25 foot drainage g g <br /> easement that is located along the east property Request by <br /> Continental <br /> Mr. Charles Cook, representing Continental DevelShmrwo, <br /> 2673 herwod <br /> Development, stated that at the last meeting it was Road,SPlanning <br /> requested that Staff contact the City Attorney for Case No. 321-91 <br /> his opinion of the legality of City Council <br /> wsolution No. 2120 which specifies a 58 foot front <br /> rd setback for Lot 16 of Red Oak Park. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.