03-21-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A Mounds View Planning Commiss o " h d a J `> s DMarch 6, 1991 Regular Meeting j r `'"�� Page Three 111 The Planning Commission discussed both the positive and negative effects that a Code change could have on all properties in the City, not just the property in question. The Planning Commission inquired as to how many houses were adjacent to the subject property to the east and what were their setbacks . Planner Harrington indicated that the three houses to the east of this proposal were all at 58 feet. Commissioner Peterson reiterated that the definition of "block" needs to be interpreted in this particular case. He also indicated that the adjacent house to the east of the property in question is at 58 feet and is the only house there to fit this definition as it currently is written. Commissioner Zollner indicated that she felt the problem was self-created and the Planning Commission cannot reverse the resolution already passed by the City Council. Aiklanner Harrington again explained to the applicant "plat he could appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council in the event he is not satisfied with the Planning Commission's decision. Motion/Second: Zollner/Colleen to approve Resolution No. 309-91 denying the variance request by Continental Development for a front yard setback at 2673 Sherwood Road, Planning Case No. 321-91. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried It was noted that the applicant, Mr. John Engberg, 6 . Consideration was not present. of Resolution Nos . 310-91 and The Planning Commission reviewed Resolution Nos . 311-91 310-91 and 311-91. Regarding Variance and Planner Harrington explained that Mr. Engberg is CUP Requests by requesting a conditional use permit to allow 307 John Engberg, square feet of accessory building where Mounds View 3030 Co. Rd. J, Code allows up to 400 square feet with a conditional Planning Case use permit. He also explained that Mr. Engberg is No. 304-90 also requesting a variance to allow 900 square feet 111