Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission July 2, 1991 <br /> Regular Meeting Page Two <br /> Planner Harrington asked if the Planning Commission 6 . Staff Report • <br /> desired to have the meeting closed at this time to <br /> discuss the proposal from Accessibuilding Corporation <br /> for the development of a duplex at Lot 1, Block 1, <br /> Dailey Knolls, and then reopen the meeting for <br /> Planning Commission action. It was the consensus of <br /> the Planning Commission to leave the meeting open and <br /> continue with the discussion of this proposal. <br /> It was noted that Mr. Michael Jordan and Mr. Craig <br /> Rushmier, representing the Accessibuilding <br /> Corporation, were present. <br /> Planner Harrington provided the Planning Commission <br /> with a copy of the site plan, planning application <br /> and letter of intent from Accessibuilding Corporation <br /> regarding the construction of a duplex on Silver Lake <br /> Road (Dailey Knolls, Lot 1, Block 1) . <br /> Chair Mountin requested that in the future a <br /> landscape plan be provided for duplex proposals. <br /> Chair Mountin inquired as to the setback requirements <br /> of the proposed duplex on Silver Lake Road. Mr. <br /> Jordon indicated he would like to set the structure • <br /> back 10 to 15 feet further than required on Silver <br /> Lake Road and have a "U" shaped driveway to allow <br /> easier accessibility to Silver Lake Road. <br /> Planner Harrington indicated that according to City <br /> Code, a 30 foot setback from the right-of-way line of <br /> Silver Lake Road is required. He also informed the <br /> Planning Commission that there were no adjoining <br /> structures that would figure into the setback <br /> requirements . <br /> Commissioner Miller questioned the option of two <br /> driveways as noted on the proposed resolution, and if <br /> it is possible to have a "U" shaped driveway. <br /> Planner Harrington indicated a "U" shaped driveway is <br /> allowed by Code on the property. <br /> Commissioner Burgers questioned the need for a single <br /> driveway. Planner Harrington informed the Planning <br /> Commission that with two driveways, 40 feet was <br /> needed between them. With configuration of the <br /> structure and easement requirement, the required 40 <br /> feet could be obtained. Mr. Jordan stated that he <br /> and Planner Harrington would visit the site to <br /> determine the best access option. <br /> Planner Harrington indicated that it should be I <br /> included in the resolution that a landscape <br />