Laserfiche WebLink
A. tipecwfies that a minimum alteration may be allowed when <br /> necessary if substantial or significant adverse effect upon <br /> ecological and hycrologlcai characteristics of the wetland <br /> do not occur, that an alteration may not be allowed without <br /> variance it minimum permit standards are exceeded; and that <br /> any alteration opportunity must be allocated among property <br /> owners in proportion to the area of wetland located within <br /> each property. <br /> 5TANDARD; 1. <br /> } alteration shall not cause a reduction it :food storage <br /> capacity, <br /> COH.LIANCD STATUS: <br /> S+ANDAP.D: 2 . Aly alteration shall not the she ex:stir.^ water quality <br /> enhancement value <br /> COMPLIANCE STATUS: <br /> STANDARD: 3. Any alteration shall not reducethe a exx <br /> isting wildlife <br /> habitat value. <br /> COMPLIANCE 5T`s'TS: The wildlife habitat assessment was value based on <br /> characterization of the8 <br /> Y' " wetland obtained from.._cm the National Wetland <br /> Inventory Map and the Corps identification of two Type II wet prairie <br /> remnants. The method to set habitat value appears to have come from the <br /> Minnesota Department of Transportation Wetland Sabitat -Mitigation <br /> B r � a� Program, This program amt use the <br /> g U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br /> Zab{tat igluation Procedure to calculate habitat value by wetland type'. <br /> The values are generic for a best imaginable .. la with n a <br /> 41111 particular R DOT district. <br />