Laserfiche WebLink
_-...,....,;,.,,c, y 444.%za raise <br /> concerns about potential groundwater quality impacts. <br /> • <br /> STANDA70:: 17. - . .. <br /> All buildings, other than accessory buildings, shall be set <br /> back 100 teet tram the wetland. <br /> rhe applicant has requested a variance twos: this standard. <br /> STANDARD: 1t3. Accessory building setback standard. <br /> COMPLIANCE STATUS: No accessory buildings are proposed. <br /> STANDARD: 19 . Lowest floor elevation in wetland zoning district shall be <br /> 2 feet above 100-year frequency flow level. <br /> COMPLIANCE STATUS: The 100-year frequencyflood for level t 5is wetland is <br /> 903 feet MSL. The lowest building as <br /> d elevation evasion spawn on the plan sheet is <br /> 905 feet MSL. If the structures ructures do not have • wevati.ors <br /> less than the pad <br />. IP <br /> elevation, the proposed plan is in compliance with the standards. <br /> STANDARD: 20. Altezations resultingin health <br /> 1.ea_,.h and safety risk or high <br /> maintenance costs shall not be allowed. <br /> CO;�LIAD7CZ STATUS: Sarr <br /> does not have the expertize necessary to evaluate <br /> health and safety issues. The maintenance cost standard was assessed, <br /> however. au <br /> ver. In r opinion, the Positioning of the p=- . <br /> access) will makeremoval of accumulated sediments unnecessarily costly. <br /> We do not believe the proposed design meets this standard. <br /> ,?^ 21. Removal of vegetation shall be permitted only when <br /> reasonably required for the placement of structures and use <br /> of property. <br /> • <br /> COMPLIAMSTAT`$: If the City believes that filling should be further <br /> minimized by limiting the size of backyards, the proposed plan does not <br /> • meet this standard. <br />