Laserfiche WebLink
c <br /> • RESOLUTION NO. 368-93 <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY VICTORIA BOWERS <br /> FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL DOG KENNEL ON <br /> HER PROPERTY AT 8351 GROVELAND ROAD, PLANNING CASE NO. 338-91 <br /> WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed <br /> the request of Victoria Bowers for a Conditional Use Permit to <br /> allow the establishment of a residential dog kennel at 8351 <br /> Groveland Road; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Mounds <br /> View Municipal Code and recognizes that the Code allows for <br /> residential dog kennels with a Conditional Use Permit; and <br /> WHEREAS, Chapter 40. 25 Subdivision C (1-6) outlines the <br /> criteria by which all Conditional Use Permit requests are reviewed. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View <br /> Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the <br /> • requested Conditional Use Permit based upon the following: <br /> 1. The use will not create an excessive burden on existing <br /> parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and <br /> utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> 2 . The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by <br /> distance or screening from adjacent residentially zoned or <br /> used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in <br /> value and there will be no deterrence to development of <br /> vacant land. <br /> 3 . The structure and site have an appearance that will not <br /> have an adverse effect upon adjacent residential properties. <br /> 4 . The use, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, is <br /> reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to <br /> the existing land use. <br /> 5. The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning <br /> Code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the <br /> applicant intends to locate the proposed use. <br /> 6. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of <br /> the City. <br /> • 7. The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br />