Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> •Mounds View Planning Commission November 3 , 1993 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> that the setback variance is granted or <br /> the six foot fence could be a <br /> contingency of the setback approval. <br /> The applicants, Robert and Greg Waste, <br /> were in attendance. Greg Waste <br /> indicated that he has been working with <br /> the neighbors on this and that they are <br /> in favor of the six foot high fence. <br /> Commissioner Ruggles asked what kind of <br /> a hardship statement the applicant was <br /> making. <br /> Chair Peterson stated that this case is <br /> a bit unusual in that the parking <br /> problems at Robert's are more of a <br /> hardship on the neighborhood than a <br /> physical property hardship. <br /> Commissioner Nelson expressed concerns <br /> about the storm sewer run-off - if the <br /> • added burden of water damages the storm <br /> sewer, would the City be financially <br /> responsible? . <br /> Greg Waste stated that if the City <br /> requires gating, it will actually lessen <br /> the burden on the storm sewer from <br /> existing levels. <br /> Planner Harrington clarified that this <br /> particular area of the City has a very <br /> limited storm sewer capacity. It cannot <br /> handle the run-off from 100 year storm <br /> levels; however, adding the additional <br /> parking will not add to the problem if <br /> the gating control measures are <br /> installed. <br /> Commissioner Nelson commented that while <br /> the gating control measures may decrease <br /> the water discharge rates, they will not <br /> keep out the additional pollutants that <br /> will results from the extra run-off. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson noted that the <br /> water capacity is already a problem that <br /> the City Council will have to address. <br /> The question in his mind was whether the <br />