Laserfiche WebLink
LINARITIOVED <br /> • Mounds View Planning Commission November 4, 1992 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> Commissioner Burgers said that he didn't <br /> see a reason to make the applicant <br /> change his setback plans. He said that <br /> while alternatives to the applicant's <br /> plan do exist, he questions whether the <br /> alternatives are any better than the <br /> variance request. Commissioner Burgers <br /> also felt that this variance can be <br /> justified because the lot is so unique <br /> and that there would be no special <br /> privilege being conferred upon the <br /> applicant. <br /> Chair Mountin's opinion was that the <br /> alternatives presented to the Commission <br /> are reasonable even though the property <br /> is unique. <br /> Motion/Second: Ruggles/Nelson to <br /> approve a variance to allow a garage at <br /> S a 19' front yard setback at 2296 <br /> Pinewood Drive. <br /> 6 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried <br /> Chair Mountin voted against approving <br /> the variance, as she feels that the <br /> alternative of a detached garage is a <br /> reasonable alternative and that in her <br /> opinion, an 11' variance is not the <br /> minimum needed to alleviate the <br /> applicant's hardship. <br /> There was no staff report. 8. Staff Report <br /> Chair Mountin asked about the status of 9. Reports of <br /> the outdoor storage of vehicles at Chair and <br /> Bumper to Bumper. Planner Harrington Commissioners <br /> indicated that he would be meeting with <br /> representatives from Bumper to Bumper to <br /> address the situation. <br /> Commissioner Miller asked about the <br /> status of the lighting at Hardee's. <br /> Planner Harrington replied that Hardee's <br /> had readjusted their lighting, although <br /> 411 they had not removed the flags that were <br /> causing the disturbance. <br />