My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-05-1995
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
04-05-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 7:14:21 AM
Creation date
7/31/2018 6:37:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/5/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> 4111 RESOLUTION NO. 412-95 <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING/DENYING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW FOR A <br /> DRIVEWAY SETBACK ENCROACHMENT AT 7947 GREENFIELD AVENUE, <br /> PLANNING CASE 406-95 <br /> WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has <br /> reviewed the request of Donald Hoseck for a variance to allow a <br /> driveway at a setback less than that allowed by Municipal Code; <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicants property is subject to the <br /> requirements setforth in Title 1100 of the Mounds View Municipal <br /> Code; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the <br /> criteria used to evaluate all variance requests; and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has/has not presented a hardship <br /> statement to the Planning Commission; and <br /> • WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of theP rovisions <br /> of this code would/would not deprive the applicant of rights <br /> commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under <br /> the terms of this Code; and <br /> WHEREAS, the special conditions of the property do/do <br /> not result from the actions of the applicant; and <br /> WHEREAS, granting the variance would/would not confer <br /> special privileges on the applicant that are not enjoyed by other <br /> property owners in the same district; and <br /> WHEREAS, the variance requested is/is not the minimum <br /> necessary to alleviate the hardship. <br /> 4111 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.