Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br /> i ti odu�on <br /> Tax Increment Financing (TIF) uses the increased property taxes <br /> generated by new real estate development within tax increment <br /> financing districts to pay for certain eligible costs associated with <br /> the development The value that is "captured" (i.e., the increase in <br /> value over the year the TiF district was established) generates <br /> property taxes. These "incremental"taxes go to the development <br /> authority or the city authority rather than to the county, school, city, <br /> or other taxing districts that normally share in the total property tax <br /> bill. The captured taxes are used to subsidize eligible project costs <br /> such as land acquisition, demolition, public and site improvements, <br /> and related consulting and administrative costs. The value of the <br /> property prior to development (i.e., the "non-captured" portion) <br /> continues to generate property taxes which are distributed to all <br /> taxing jurisdictions. <br /> The justification for use of TIF rests solely on the "Hut For" test. A <br /> simple way to express this test is that the development or <br /> redevelopment would not occur without a tax increment subsidy. <br /> Critics of TIF often point to the "Hut For" test as the weakness in <br /> the actual use of TiF. Such critics often claim that the development . <br /> would have occurred anyway, and local officials are not rigorously <br /> applying this test The net result in such cases is an over use of tax <br /> increment financing at the expense of the tax base of the county, <br /> school district, and other taxing districts. While there have been <br /> limited abuses, as with any other financing program, this financing <br /> tool has helped to reshape and revitalize many communities. In <br /> addition to assisting core development and redevelopment, residual <br /> growth outside of the established TiF districts provides a direct <br /> benefit to all taxing jurisdictions. <br /> in response to the potential misuse of tax increment financing, each <br /> year the State Legislature further adjusts and limits the use of this <br /> financing tool. Each amendment to the statutes has, in recent <br /> years, resulted in a more complicated and:restrictive financing <br /> vehicle. The purpose of this document is to outline the basic <br /> concepts and mechanics of using tax increment financing within the <br /> statutory guidelines and parameters. This report outlines the <br /> participants involved in TiE, mechanics, documents, process, a <br /> discussion of benefits and costs, and policy questions associated <br /> with the use of TIF. <br /> • <br /> The material included in our report is intended to be used as <br /> informational guidelines for the use of TiF. The complete Tax <br /> Increment Financing Act can be fcund in Minnesota Statutes, <br /> Section 469.174 - 469.179. <br /> S?RINGSTED <br />