My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-06-1995
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
12-06-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 7:11:36 AM
Creation date
7/31/2018 7:07:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/6/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 1, 1995 <br /> ()Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> Motion/Second: Ruggles/Miller to <br /> approve Resolution No. 433-95 regarding <br /> the conditional use permit request of <br /> Brian Daniels, 7280 Silver Lake Road. <br /> A couple of concerns were raised by the <br /> Planning Commission regarding compliance <br /> with Item B of the resolution, <br /> ". . .providing a uniform appearance with <br /> the dwelling unit", about the current <br /> condition of the garage being an <br /> "eyesore", what repercussions would Mr. <br /> Daniels face for constructing the <br /> addition without a permit, and will <br /> inspections still be required even <br /> though the structure has been built. <br /> Planner Harrington assured the <br /> Commission that the City would follow up <br /> on these items and pointed out that when <br /> construction occurs without a building <br /> 0 permit, the fees are doubled and <br /> reassured them that any inspections <br /> required will still be conducted. <br /> It was also asked that if the applicant <br /> is in violation of the Home Occupation <br /> ordinance, will he be subject to an <br /> administrative offense and Mr. <br /> Harrington stated that he would be. <br /> One final question regarding this item <br /> was raised by the Planning Commission as <br /> to whefhPr or not this property was <br /> located within a wetland. Planner <br /> Harrington informed the Commission that <br /> this property was not located directly <br /> within the wetland, and therefore, no <br /> wetland permit is required. It was <br /> noted, however, that the property was <br /> within the 100' wetland buffer area. <br /> 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Planner Harrington informed the 9. Staff Report <br /> • Commission that at the next agenda <br /> session the Sign Ordinance will be <br /> discussed. He also mentioned that every <br /> business in the City was invited to a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.