My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-03-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
04-03-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:17:24 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 7:36:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/3/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Staff believes that the substitute amendment meets these guidelines but <br /> that the proposal could not become significantly more restrictive <br /> without endangering the City's conformance to the.guidelines. First, <br /> • the available land mass is 6.5% of the city's total, comfortably above <br /> the 5% standard. However, a significant part of this percentage is <br /> devoted to the airport and the waste water treatment plant, uses which <br /> are not likely to be redeveloped in the foreseeable future. Secondly, <br /> the available land includes sites with fairly good development <br /> potential. However, if the required distance to "protected uses" were <br /> significantly expanded, few such sites would remain. Finally, the <br /> "relative site capacity" of 28 exceeds the number of existing adult uses <br /> in Saint Paul (18) . However, because two of Saint Paul's existing adult <br /> uses are multi-functional facilities (with 3 or 4 types of adult uses <br /> per business) , it is preferable to calculate the existing number of <br /> adult uses to be 24. Thus, it is not advisable to make the ordinance <br /> more restrictive in a way that would reduce the city's relative site <br /> capacity for adult uses. <br /> 8. Review of the Special Condition Use Permit <br /> EXPLANATION: The substitute amendment requires an annual review of each <br /> adult use's Special Condition Use Permit. The Zoning Code currently <br /> requires that an adult use obtain a Special Condition Use Permit but <br /> does not provide for an annual review. <br /> RATIONALE: Because the substitute amendment requires that there be only <br /> one type of adult use. per building, the annual review of the Special <br /> Condition Use Permit will ensure that no- additional uses are added to <br /> the type of adult use that is permitted. <br /> 9. Prohibition of Obscene Works and Illegal Activities <br /> EXPLANATION: In numerous places, the substitute amendment stipulates <br /> that obscene and illegal activities are not permitted in adult uses. <br /> This is not explicitly stated in the Zoning Code currently. <br /> RATIONALE: This provision is intended to guard against the conclusion <br /> that the Zoning Code permits activities which the City can and should <br /> prohibit as illegal. <br /> i <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.