Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />July 10, 1996 <br />Page 10 <br />Elliott -Hendrickson regarding the need for a <br />drainage plan. <br />Acting Director Pruitt also informed the <br />Planning Commission that the condition of <br />ensuring adequate sprinkler systems for the <br />existing building had been removed from the <br />contingencies placed on the resolution. She <br />explained that she had contacted Attorney Bob <br />Long to conduct additional research to <br />ascertain whether it is legally appropriate for <br />the City to require fire sprinkling for the existing <br />building. <br />Acting Director Pruitt read each contingency <br />contained in Resolution No. 462-96, the first <br />being that a development agreement be <br />entered into between the church and the City of <br />Mounds View. <br />The fire suppression requirements were briefly <br />discussed by the Planning Commission and <br />Acting Director Pruitt noted that the attorney is <br />looking into whether or not it must be required <br />for this request. <br />The applicant, Gary Olson, addressed the <br />Planning Commission informing them that the <br />building is not occupied often with the <br />exception of Sundays. He also expressed that <br />a fire detection system may be better and that <br />he thinks fire sprinkling is an unreasonable <br />request due to financial reasons. He continued <br />by informing the Commission that this will be <br />the final expansion of the facility and requiring <br />fire suppression will reduce the addition by 20 <br />percent, or possibly will not allow the expansion <br />at all. Mr. Olson also noted that fire <br />extinguishers are located throughout the -facility <br />and an increased number of emergency exists <br />have been added on the plans for the new <br />addition. He also indicated that he plans to <br />• <br />