Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />March 18, 1993, and in order for the Planning <br />Commission to consider this request, a <br />variance extension must be granted, then a <br />development review process would begin. <br />Acting Director Pruitt informed the Commission <br />that Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, the City's <br />Engineering Consultant, has reviewed the site <br />plan and found the expansion should have no <br />negative impacts on the drainage system. She <br />also noted that, based on the discussion at the <br />June 19th meeting, parking appears to be <br />adequate for the site. <br />Acting Director Pruitt noted that a revised <br />resolution had been distributed to the Planning <br />Commission. The contingency contained in <br />Resolution No. 458-96 was noted stating that <br />the variance shall become void if the work is <br />not finished within one year of issuance. <br />The Planning Commission inquired whether or <br />not this proposed variance request is similar to <br />the previously approved variance and Acting <br />Director Pruitt replied that she had been in <br />contact with Paul Harrington, former <br />Community Development Director, who stated <br />that this request is very similar to their previous <br />request. She also noted that the addition <br />would be used for storage of items and <br />equipment currently stored outside and that the <br />addition would line up with the existing building. <br />The Planning Commission then questioned <br />whether or not it should be a new variance, not <br />an extension of the previously approved <br />variance since the variance expired in 1993. <br />Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Johnston to <br />approve Resolution No. 458-96 as amended <br />approving the variance request of Herbst and <br />Sons Construction Co., Inc., 2299 County Road <br />H. <br />July 10, 1996 <br />Page 6 <br />• <br />• <br />