Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 9L <br />Meeting Date: January 24, 2005 <br />Type of Business: Council Business <br />Administrator Review: _____ City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: Charles Hansen, Finance Director <br />Item Title/Subject: Resolution 6445 Amending the 2005 General Fund <br />and Economic Development Authority Fund <br />Budgets <br /> <br />The City has followed the practice of allocating certain percentages of payroll <br />costs of the City Administrator (10%), Finance Director (10%), and Community <br />Development Director (15%) to the budget of the Economic Development Authority <br />(EDA). These percentages are loaded into the payroll system and the costs are <br />automatically allocated to the EDA. <br /> <br />Last fall, Ehlers & Associates Inc., the City’s financial advisor for tax increment <br />financing (TIF), advised us that this procedure probably would not stand up in the <br />event of a TIF audit by the Office of the State Auditor. The State Auditor expects <br />to see timesheets with actual hours recorded for specific meetings attended or <br />work on specific projects. <br /> <br />We feel the percentages used are reasonable and reflect the total effort devoted to <br />TIF matters. However, it is problematic to record all that time on the timesheet. <br /> <br />In my own case, I spend substantial time supervising accounts payable, payroll, <br />insurance, investments, budget and financial reporting. TIF matters benefit from <br />all of these efforts. But to put it on my time sheet would mean record 10% of many <br />small slices of time spent on a succession of activities each day. <br /> <br />To alleviate this problem and head off a possible problem in a future TIF audit, I <br />would like to reduce the percentages of staff time we allocate to the EDA. This <br />would make it easier to justify the costs with time spent in larger blocks of time in <br />meetings or working on larger projects. We would still need to record time spent <br />on TIF, but the amounts would be more attainable. <br /> <br />Doing this will shift personnel costs from the EDA to the General Fund in the 2005 <br />budget. To neutralize the effect on the budget, I propose to shift another cost from <br />the General Fund to the EDA. This would be the Housing Resource Center <br />membership fee of $10,700 that is currently in the Community Development <br />Budget in the General Fund. Ehlers has agreed that the Housing Resource <br />Center membership fee is an allowable TIF expense.