Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br />easement slices through part of the house and garage, so that needs to be resolved. He stated <br />that the next item on the agenda is to vacate that easement. He stated that the property owners <br />have already executed an easement document which essentially rededicates that same easement, <br />but consistent with the lot lines. <br /> <br />Council Member Flaherty asked whether either of the residents had a problem with this. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that they do not. <br /> <br />Council Member Flaherty asked if there were any administrative fees associated with this on the <br />City’s part. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that there may be some minimal legal fees involved. He stated it had <br />been communicated to the property owner that if there were additional expenses, they would be <br />responsible for them. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Stigney. To approve Resolution 6419 Approving <br />a Lot Line Adjustment (Minor Subdivision) Between 8265 and 8281 Spring Lake Road, and to <br />waive the reading. <br /> <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />I. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 757, an Ordinance Vacating an <br />Unused and Excess Utility Easement Associated with 8265 Spring Lake Road <br />(Ericson) <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that the property owners have executed a new easement which replaces <br />the former easement, but City Charter requires that any release of easement areas be done by <br />ordinance, so this is the first reading which would effectuate that vacation. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND. Stigney/Flaherty. To approve the Introduction and First Reading of <br />Ordinance 757, an Ordinance Vacating an Unused and Excess Utility Easement Associated with <br />8265 Spring Lake Park, and to waive the reading. <br /> <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />J. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 756, an Ordinance Amending <br />the Mounds View Municipal Code Relating to Non-Conforming Driveways <br />and Curb-Cuts, <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated that when the City Council adopted Ordinance 752 last year, what that <br />Ordinance did was strike language from the City Code that provided an allowance for a one- <br />foot setback for driveways in R-1 or R2 District. He stated when the Planning Commission was <br />going through that Ordinance, it became quite apparent that there were other issues that <br />needed to be addressed as well. He stated that he had spelled out in the staff report what some