My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/04/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/04/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:35 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:12:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/25/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/25/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 14, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty asked whether Public Works had gone over budget in the last couple of budgets. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated individual components may have been over, but Public Works as 3 <br />a total entity had not been over. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Flaherty stated he didn’t like going over budgets, but if there was somewhere 6 <br />else to shift the money from, he wouldn’t have a problem with approving it. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that he would come back with a detailed proposal of where 9 <br />the money could come from. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Thomas and Mayor Marty stated they would also feel comfortable with that. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Stigney stated perhaps this was an opportune time to work with a reduced staff 14 <br />of seven people. He raised an issue of seeing employees standing and driving around aimlessly 15 <br />in the past. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Council Member Thomas stated she would like to adopt the Resolution with Option 1 with seven 18 <br />positions, and have two weeks of discussion on what to do regarding hiring three others. 19 <br /> 20 <br />MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Gunn. To Approve Resolution 6436 with Option 1 with seven 21 <br />positions, Approving the 2005 Public Works Seasonal Employee Positions. 22 <br /> 23 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 24 <br /> 25 <br />C. 7:25 Public Hearing to Consider a Variance Request for a Reduced Number of 26 <br />Covered Parking Spaces at Greenfield Estates Located at 7635 Greenfield Avenue 27 <br /> 28 <br />Director Ericson informed the Council that Greenfield Estates would like to build 100 29 <br />garages, and by Code they are required to have 125 since they have 125 units. He stated they 30 <br />only rent 50 percent of their current 125 garages out now. The Planning Commission voted 3-3 31 <br />on this issue, so the motion failed, and the applicant has appealed that decision. He stated that he 32 <br />has not received any comment from the property owners in the area regarding this issue, but that 33 <br />Staff supports this plan and the renovation of the site. However, the Planning Commission 34 <br />recommends that this not be approved because they fail to find a hardship and there is adequate 35 <br />space to construct 125 stalls. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 10:13 p.m. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Alan Menning, who offices at 321 University Avenue SE, Minneapolis, stated he has managed 40 <br />Greenfield Estates for 20 some years. He explained the problems they’ve had with the garages 41 <br />being placed where they are, and with people starting fires, vandalism, climbing fences, dumping 42 <br />garbage, etc. He also explained that the new garages will have garage door openers so that 43 <br />people won’t have to get out of their cars anymore to open and close the garage doors. He stated 44 <br />they would exceed the Code for outdoor parking by having 325 spaces. He explained how if they 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.