Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Member Thomas stated she is familiar with what City Staff would like to see, and 1 <br />she asked if the property owner had a desired use. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Mr. Nelson stated their preference would be to round out the rest of the business park with a 4 <br />building on that corner that mirrors the Multitech Building or the Liberty Building across the 5 <br />street. He stated they had received calls from other developers who are interested in the site for 6 <br />a more typical suburban strip type development. He stated he could envision possibly a small 7 <br />strip center with a bank or a restaurant. He stated that it is not a project that is going to take 8 <br />three years to put together. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Council Member Thomas stated her assumption was that even if they were to do a general 11 <br />office complex or retail strip with restaurant, they would be looking at about a year to put 12 <br />together this development concept, so even if they are talking about a year waiver, this would 13 <br />have to be a phone call he got this week. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mr. Nelson stated that that was right. He stated that in one of the buildings in Mounds View 16 <br />Business Park right across from Woodale was a building where Medtronic made a call, and they 17 <br />had the building plans approved, and they started it in December, and they were in in 89 days. 18 <br />He stated that was a long time ago, but that is the kind of thing that can happen, and it’s not as 19 <br />likely to happen with a mixed use retail. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Council Member Thomas stated that should that proposal come to the table, she seriously 22 <br />doubted that the sewer connection is going to be the first of their concerns. She asked what 23 <br />their cutoff point was for saying that something is imminent. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Council Member Gunn asked about the other three properties. She stated she understood he 26 <br />owned two of them, but in order to do this full development, they need to get the other three 27 <br />property owners in the picture also. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Council Member Thomas stated she was not talking about those other three; she was just 30 <br />talking about their properties. She stated if they start talking about the other three, that’s 31 <br />a much bigger issue. She stated she was talking about the properties they have control over 32 <br />and what they are talking about doing and can they do anything within a year. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Council Member Gunn stated from what she was looking at, they don’t have much to do that 35 <br />they could do something with. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Mr. Nelson stated they could do something on one or both of their properties, but that it made 38 <br />more planning sense to look at the whole six-acre package, including the three residences. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Council Member Thomas stated she was not going to start planning for someone else’s home. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Gunn stated she wasn’t either. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Mr. Nelson stated that they’ve been approached multiple times, and there is going to come a 45