Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />1. Announce that the Mounds View Employee Appreciation Lunch will be 2 <br />on Wednesday, June 8, 2005 from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. 3 <br /> 4 <br />City Clerk/Administrator Ulrich announced the Mounds View Employee Appreciation Lunch 5 <br />will be 6 <br />on Wednesday, June 8th, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. He stated it was for the Council’s 7 <br />attendance if they are available. 8 <br /> 9 <br />2. Long Range Financial Plan 10 <br /> 11 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated he had not been able to attend the April 4th work session, and he 12 <br />would be answering some questions that came up. He stated that in the long-range plan dealing 13 <br />with bond issuance, there was not a bond issue in the year 2009 related to this street project, and 14 <br />the question was why. The tentative plan he used in terms of the street reconstruction had a high 15 <br />percentage of municipal state aid for streets and roads being done that year, and so there was 16 <br />only going to be about $200,000 worth of costs that would be bonded for that and would be 17 <br />repaid at the property tax levy, and the financial advisor had advised him that is too small an 18 <br />amount to be bonded for and the bond issuance costs would be too much, so the plan is simply to 19 <br />hold that over to the year 2010 and then propose to issue a larger number of bonds in the year 20 <br />2010. He stated the year 2009 was not missed, and it was just a small bond issue, so it was 21 <br />carried over and lumped into the next year. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated the other question that came up is a request for a projection of 24 <br />property tax bills that would occur in the future with the bond issues going on for the street 25 <br />program. He stated that due to the complexity of the property tax system in the state, that’s 26 <br />extremely difficult to do a projection on, especially going out into the future with the bond 27 <br />issues. He stated he attempted to make a projection, with the caveat that it’s not something you 28 <br />can rely on. He explained how he got to the figure of $141 or 7 percent on the home tax bill, but 29 <br />that if they do proceed on the street program, he was sure in nine years they would be looking at 30 <br />a tax levy that would be different than this. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Brian Amundson, 3048 Woodale Drive, thanked Mr. Hanson for attempting to make this 33 <br />projection. He asked what the median home value was that he used. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Finance Director Hanson stated that the median home value for 2005 has an estimated market 36 <br />value of $178,000, and a limited market value of $162,000, which is what the tax is based on. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Thomas cautioned that he was not able to build into this any county increases 39 <br />for valuation changes to the market, which is the number one inflationary issue they’ve been 40 <br />dealing with is the rising value in housing, and it’s just not possible for him to figure that into 41 <br />those charts, so that’s just a number they can work with for the valuation that they have. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Mr. Amundson stated that his original question was to understand the dollar impact of ten years 44 <br />worth of bonding, which is the point at which they have all of the projects actually into service. 45