My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/05/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:17:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/9/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2310 County 10 <br />Connection Report <br />April 11, 2005 <br /> <br />wrote to Mr. Nelson indicating that we would consider extending the requirement to connect if <br />they were to submit a valid redevelopment application for the properties in question. If a <br />valid application was not received or they did not intend to develop the property within a year, <br />connection would be required. <br /> <br />On February 25, 2005, Mr. Nelson submitted a redevelopment application for properties they <br />own at 2310 and 2260 County Road 10 as well as the three parcels in between theirs, which <br />they do NOT own. Because the property owners of the three non-Everest lots did not sign or <br />consent to the application, the City could not accept the application and thus returned the <br />application to Mr. Nelson on March 1, 2005. I reiterated the City’s position that connections <br />would need to be made no later than May 1, 2005 or submit a written appeal to be <br />considered by the City Council. Staff received the appeal from Mr. Nelson dated March 21, <br />2005. Staff responded that the City Council would hear his appeal on April 11, 2005. <br /> <br />On April 11, 2005, staff presented the City Council with a report on the property <br />recommending that either connection be required to municipal services or if a one-year <br />extension was to be granted, that the extension be subject to the property owners submitting <br />a cash surety to guarantee that the improvements would be made after the end of the <br />extension period. The Council directed staff to bring forth a resolution approving the one- <br />year extension subject to a $15,000 cash surety. Resolution 6522 is attached to this report <br />which authorizes that direction. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Approve Resolution 6522, a resolution prepared as directed by the City Council, approving a <br />one-year extension of the connection municipal services requirements to 2310 County Road <br />10, subject to receipt of a cash surety in the amount of $15,000. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Community Development Director <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.