My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2005/06/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agenda Packets - 2005/06/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:40 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:30:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/27/2005
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/27/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 20, 2005 <br />Special Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Brian Kaden, 7675 Spring Lake Road, stated he has lived in the City for 32 years and he liked the 1 <br />idea of Medtronic coming into the City, but he did not like Medtronic coming into the City at the 2 <br />cost of the taxpayers and he did not like to subsidize businesses. He stated Mounds View had the 3 <br />fourth highest TIF in the state. He asked if he would get a tax break if he put an addition on his 4 <br />house through TIF financing. He stated the taxpayers were helping the businesses pay their 5 <br />mortgage and that was one of the reasons he believed this was not a good deal. He stated the TIF 6 <br />financing was put into place to develop land that was not desirable and this practice was being 7 <br />abused. He questioned how much of a benefit Medtronic would have in the City being located in 8 <br />the northeast portion of the City. He believed Shoreview and Blaine businesses were going to 9 <br />benefit more than the Mounds View businesses because of the location. He stated Medtronic 10 <br />was a multi-billion dollar company and if they were a good corporate neighbor, why were they 11 <br />asking for a tax break that the citizens did not get. He asked why Medtronic was not paying the 12 <br />same taxes as Walgreens. He stated this would be a good project if Medtronic was not requiring 13 <br />TIF financing. He suggested the City look at their TIF financing programs in the future. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Lloyd Bardwell, 2932 County Road J, stated County Road J was a public drag strip. He agreed 16 <br />that Medtronic was a good corporation, but he also agreed Medtronic should not be given TIF 17 <br />financing. He expressed concern about the increase in traffic on County Road J and he hated 18 <br />living in his home because of the traffic. He stated there was no enforcement along that road and 19 <br />the infrastructure was missing to go east and west on the road. He stated he was for the 20 <br />development, but he did not believe Medtronic was paying their fair share of taxes. He stated he 21 <br />was not complaining about his taxes, but the City needed to do something about the speeding 22 <br />traffic. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Peter Martin, 2192 Oakwood Drive, stated he has been playing The Bridges Golf Course since 25 <br />day one. He indicated dollars are fine and the large companies are going to get the money no 26 <br />matter what they did, but what about the land and its value to the community and the values like 27 <br />families being able to play golf together, health and fitness values, natural and wildlife values, 28 <br />and moral values. He noted moral values are what the citizens need most and were harder to 29 <br />come buy. He stated golf was based on honesty, integrity, and patience and these were values 30 <br />needed by the children today because they were not taught in the school system anymore. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, stated she has lived in the City for 39 years. She indicated 33 <br />Medtronic was a good company and she was neither for nor against this project, but she needed 34 <br />more information. She thanked the Community Development Director for preparing the options 35 <br />she had requested at a previous meeting. She noted Fridley had an appraisal done of $137.00 per 36 <br />square foot and through mediation it went down to $109.00 and the $80.00 per square foot was 37 <br />not a fair price. She stated Twin Lakes Development in Roseville was going for $300,000 per 38 <br />acre and Medtronic negotiated $120,000 per acre. She stated they were getting an appraiser price 39 <br />as it was not as it was built out and she believed Medtronic should pay more. She stated 40 <br />Medtronic should have to pay $235,000 to $260,000 per acre. She noted Medtronic had 4 billion 41 <br />in cash and asked why the City was doing to subsidies for a company who had this type of 42 <br />money. Community Development Director Ericson replied with regard to the Twin Lakes 43 <br />Development there were a lot of improvements made to the land in order for it to be sold and 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.