Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 13, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Gunn. To Approve Resolution 6558, remove Item 2 and Item 4 1 <br />and to approve the plans and specifications, setting a bid date, and authorizing staff to advertise 2 <br />for bids for the Groveland Park Building Replacement Project. 3 <br /> 4 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 5 <br /> 6 <br />G. Set a Special Meeting of the City Council for June 20, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. at 7 <br />the Mounds View Community Center located at 5294 Edgewood Drive for 8 <br />the purposes of considering the proposed sale of land comprising the Bridges 9 <br />of Mounds View Golf Course to Medtronic. 10 <br /> 11 <br />City Clerk/Administrator Ulrich stated that the meeting on June 20th is to be a joint meeting with 12 <br />the City Council and EDA noting that the items to be discussed that are applicable to both 13 <br />bodies, which are comprised of the same people but technically two different bodies. He stated 14 <br />that the public hearing for the public subsidy is also scheduled for that evening and would be part 15 <br />of the City Council’s review. He indicated that he also spoke with Bob Glazer who indicated 16 <br />that he is planning to provide Council with a ten-minute presentation during the public comments 17 <br />segment of the meeting. He reviewed the agenda noting that they would discuss the next step at 18 <br />the end of the public hearing process. He stated that it would be an open meeting with no set 19 <br />adjournment time. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Council Member Gunn suggested establishing rules of process before the meeting. She stated 22 <br />that she would like to see that everyone signs in with their name and the City they are from; 23 <br />allow Mounds View residents the opportunity to speak first, in the order of sign-in and then all 24 <br />others; everyone signed in would be allowed one time to speak; anyone with responses would be 25 <br />allowed to respond after all others have had an opportunity to speak first. She stated that this 26 <br />would provide a more orderly and fair process for the residents noting that she has received 27 <br />comments from many of the residents expressing frustration that they were not given a chance to 28 <br />speak. She stated that everyone should have an opportunity to speak and suggested that the 29 <br />Council really consider outlining the process prior to the meeting. She suggested providing the 30 <br />audience with an overview of the meeting process at the beginning of the meeting. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Stigney agreed with everything to make it orderly and asked how they would go 33 <br />about differentiating residents from non-residents. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Gunn explained that they would be able to differentiate based on the sign-in 36 <br />sheet because all speakers would be expected to sign in and include the City they reside in. 37 <br /> 38 <br />City Clerk/Administrator Ulrich stated that they discussed this at a staff level and it was thought 39 <br />that it would be a good idea to hand everyone a card. They would then sign their name on the 40 <br />card with their address and hand the card to the attendant when they come forward to speak. He 41 <br />stated that if they outline the process at the start of the meeting and then ask all residents to step 42 <br />forward to speak. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Council Member Thomas agreed stating that this would apply to all except the local business 45