My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
08-21-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:20:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/21/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> State Level • <br /> • California Public Utilities Commission <br /> In 1911, California voters passed a constitutional amendment establishing the Railroad <br /> Commission. In 1946, the Railroad Commission was renamed the California Public Utilities <br /> Commission (CPUC). The CPUC has broad powers to regulate safety, standards of service, and <br /> rates paid to privately-owned companies that provide public utilities in California. The CPUC, <br /> whose members are appointed by the Governor and approved by the Senate, has a quasi-legislative <br /> and quasi-judicial authority in that it establishes and enforces administrative regulations, and,like a <br /> court of law,may take testimony,subpoena witnesses and records,and issue decisions and orders. <br /> Of the three types of wireless communications services discussed in this paper, the CPUC presently <br /> regulates only cellular providers, which are considered public utilities. The CPUC regulates the <br /> terms and conditions of cellular service in the state. However, federal-legislation preempts the <br /> authority of the CPUC to regulate cellular rates and market entry. <br /> As previously noted, ESMR licensees operate private systems, over which the CPUC has no <br /> jurisdiction pursuant to federal legislation. At this time, the CPUC also has no regulatory authority <br /> over PCS providers. However, the CPUC may pursue acquiring the authority to regulate the terms <br /> and conditions of both ESMR and PCS services (as it currently regulates the cellular industry), <br /> given that both ESMR and PCS providers will be considered common carriers in the federal <br /> regulatory framework. <br /> General Order 159 <br /> The primary state regulation governing cellular providers is General Order 159 (G.O. 159), which <br /> was approved by the CPUC in 1990. The purpose of G.O. 159 is to ensure that: (1) the potential <br /> environmental impacts of all cellular sites are reviewed and considered in a manner consistent with <br /> the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); (2) affected local citizens, orgsni7ations, and <br /> jurisdictions are given reasonable notice and opportunities for input into the review process; (3) the <br /> public health and welfare, and zoning concerns of local jurisdictions are addressed; (4) cellular <br /> service providers-are not tmnecessaril delayed-by site-review;-and (5)-cellular-service-providers <br /> provide high quality, reliable and widespread cellular service to California residents. <br /> The main requirement imposed by the CPUC on cellular carriers is that they comply with all local <br /> rules and regulations. Under G.O. 159, cellular communications facilities may not be constructed <br /> until a carrier demonstrates that it has complied with all local regulations and obtained the <br /> necessary permits, and has filed with the CPUC either an advice letter or an application for <br /> preemptive authority to construct. The CPUC also actively enforces rules to assure compliance <br /> with local requirements and has the authority to override local decisions. The CPUC essentially <br /> serves as an agency of last resort, to which providers may appeal local determinations when all <br /> other local avenues for appeal are exhausted. Although the CPUC has the ability to override local <br /> decisions, it has used this preemptive authority in only one case in California, where a cellular <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.