My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
08-21-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:20:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/21/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
zoning district (s) to allow for PCS antenna. Provided below, <br /> however, is a general list of what are considered to be primary and 0 <br /> secondary land use districts for such facilities. <br /> primary Land Use Districts <br /> • Industrial Districts <br /> • Commercial Districts <br /> • Freeway/Highway Corridor Districts <br /> • Institutional/Public Districts <br /> • Community Athletic Complexes <br /> Secondary Land Use Districts <br /> • <br /> • High Density Residential Districts <br /> • Medium Density Residential Districts <br /> • Special Use Districts (i . e. , historic or downtown <br /> districts) <br /> • Environmentally Sensitive Areas (i . e. , shore land or <br /> scenic river) <br /> • S.F. Residential Districts <br /> IV. Performance Standards <br /> Comment: The establishment of performance standards to enhance the <br /> visual and aesthetic appearance of PCS antennas and towers is <br /> perhaps the area where local ordinances can be most improved. <br /> Performance standards can be used to reduce the number of new 1110 <br /> towers by requiring co-location or by establishing incentives to <br /> use existing buildings and facilities (i . e. , permitted use vs. <br /> conditional use) . Below are some examples of performance standards <br /> found in other cities' ordinances. <br /> It should be emphasized that not all of the provisions listed below <br /> need to be incorporated into a city's ordinance to adequately <br /> address the use of wireless telecommunication facilities. The need <br /> to include such provisions will largely depend on a city's <br /> individual circumstances such as location potential for such <br /> desire to regulate with strict control (or conversely less <br /> control) , etc. <br /> gxamples: <br /> Co-location Requirements - All commercial wireless <br /> telecommunication towers erected, constructed, or located within <br /> the City shall comply with the following requirements : <br /> 1) A proposal for a new commercial wireless <br /> telecommunication service tower shall not be approved <br /> 111 <br /> IIID <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.