My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
08-21-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:20:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/21/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V. Area Wide Analysis/Proof of Need <br /> The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a coverage/ <br /> interference analysis and capacity analyses that the location of <br /> the antenna as proposed is necessary to meet the frequency reuse <br /> and spacing needs of the wireless telecommunication facilities <br /> and to provide adequate coverage and capacity: to areas which <br /> cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas in a less <br /> restrictive district (modified from St. Paul, ASO <br /> VI. proof of Non-Interference <br /> Each application for construction of a wireless telecommunication <br /> facility shall include either a preliminary or a certified <br /> statement that the construction of the tower, including reception <br /> and transmission functions, will not interfere with the radio, <br /> television, etc. , service enjoyed by adjacent residential and <br /> nonresidential properties . In the event only a preliminary <br /> statement is submitted with the application, a final certified <br /> statement of non-interference will be provided and approved by the <br /> city prior to issuance of a building permit . The statement shall <br /> be prepared by an engineer licensed to practice in the State of <br /> Florida or other professional accepted by the Town. (modified from <br /> Jupiter, FL) <br /> VII . Setbacks <br /> 11/ <br /> Comment: Setbacks are generally regulated by base zoning district. <br /> Cities often require 1) setback based on an engineered fall zone <br /> analysis, 2) setback equal to height of tower, or 3) with greater <br /> setback adjacent to sensitive uses (i . e. , residential, schools, <br /> churches, parks, etc. ) <br /> • <br /> ,Example: <br /> Where adjacent parcels are zoned or guided for commercial or <br /> industrial uses, setbacks equivalent to those established for the <br /> principal structure shall be provided. This standard shall also <br /> apply when adjacent to residentially zoned or guided land, that, <br /> due to topography, presence of wetlands or similar limitations, the <br /> land will not be actively developed for residential use . Setbacks <br /> equal to the height of the tower shall be established on sites that <br /> are adjacent to parcels developed or able to be developed for <br /> residential use . (Minnetonka) <br /> VIII. Lighting: <br /> Information from the APA publication suggests that city ordinances <br /> commonly require that lighting meet FAA or FCC requirements and <br /> IIIE , F , G , H S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.