My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-21-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
08-21-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:20:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 1:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/21/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The most common objection to wireless communications facilities is their visual impact. <br /> Oftentimes, local residents, many of whom use wireless communications services, do not want to <br /> see towers and antennas proliferating in their own communities and have expressed fears that their <br /> property values might be affected. To address the visual aspect of wireless communications <br /> facilities,specific development standards and /or mitigation measures should be developed by local <br /> government agencies. These standards should be clearly defined and should be designed taking <br /> into consideration the technical requirements of the wireless communications technology (e.g., the <br /> technical requirement to locate antennas at a certain height and in a particular service area, or to <br /> maintain adequate separation between individua: antennas). <br /> Suggested development standards and mitigation measures may include: <br /> • <br /> • Screening antennas and towers from view from public rights-of-way or scenic vistas, either via <br /> • landscaping, fencing,or other architectural screening; <br /> • Encouraging creative design measures to camouflage facilities by integrating them with <br /> existing buildings and among other existing uses; <br /> • Where other technically feasible sites are available, minimizing the effect of the location of <br /> facilities in visually-sensitive areas, such as residential communities and open space zones; <br /> • Encouraging providers to co-locate their facilities on a single site, where technically feasible <br /> 1110 and visually desirable; and <br /> • Locating antennas and equipment on other existing community facility sites, such as on water <br /> tanks or utility poles. <br /> Specific site development standards and mitigation measures are not included in this paper. Rather, <br /> it is suggested that local governmental agencies develop their own particular standards which would <br /> best address their local communities' sensitivities to the visual element. Copies of various <br /> ordinances from other jurisdictions, which provide samples of specific site development standards <br /> for—wireless communions facilitis,are-included in-Appendix 2. <br /> 2. Provide applicable development standards and/or mitigation measures to proponents of <br /> wireless communications projects in the pre-design phase prior to project submittal. <br /> Local development standards and/or mitigation measures should be provided to proponents of <br /> wireless communications projects in written format prior to project submittal, in order to acquaint <br /> them with what designs and locations of facilities are acceptable by the particular local community. <br /> This would enable wireless communications providers to consider their own technical service <br /> requirements, as well as local objectives to minimize visual impacts, when deciding between site <br /> alternatives. <br /> 1110 The design of wireless communications facilities has evolved over time, and it is feasible in some, <br /> but not all, instances to design and/or locate facilities so that they are visually unobtrusive. The <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.