Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • Planning Case No.459-96: 7755 Spring Lake Road <br /> October 2, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Analysis/ <br /> Recommendation: <br /> The strict application of the Zoning Code (Section 1121.09, Subd. 7) would only allow <br /> the expansion of a parking area on Mr. Manning's property to within one foot of the side <br /> property line if: <br /> • the surfacing were temporary(brick or concrete pavers, asphalt construction or <br /> gravel construction), and <br /> • his neighbor gives written permission <br /> Mr. Manning desires to use concrete since his existing driveway in the area which would <br /> be extended is also concrete. The portion of the driveway which crosses Spring Lake <br /> Road right-of-way is asphalt (see plot plan). <br /> Variance Criteria (1125.02 Sub. 2) <br /> The applicant has provided a letter addressing each of the criteria for granting variances. <br /> In summary, the variance procedure is available to address situations where the normal <br /> application of the Zoning Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed <br /> by other properties in the same district. Allowing Mr. Manning to expand his parking area <br /> would address the hardship created by the parking restrictions on Spring Lake Road and <br /> the problems caused by the area along his side property line being shaded. <br /> This difficulty caused by parking restrictions is not unique to this property, however. Mr. <br /> Manning has the ability to add 6 additional feet in width (to five feet from the property <br /> line) using concrete without special permission from the City. He could add additional <br /> width on the north side of the driveway. The problems with his lawn could be addressed <br /> through a different type of landscaping. <br /> Allowing parking areas within one foot was added to the ordinance when parking was <br /> restricted on Mounds View streets. Particular thought was given to limiting such parking <br /> areas to only temporary surfacing and with permission of the neighboring property. When <br /> parking areas are placed within one foot of a property line, there is very little ability to <br /> provide buffering between the parking area and the neighbor. The requirement to obtain <br /> written permission from the neighboring property owner recognizes that parking areas that <br /> close may have an impact on the neighbor. Granting this variance would run counter to <br /> the very purpose for the Code requirement. <br /> Staff Recommendation: <br /> Approval of the attached resolution denying a request for a concrete parking area within <br /> • one foot of a side property line at 7755 Spring Lake Road. <br /> cc: John R. Manning, 7755 Spring Lake Road, Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />