My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-02-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 2:19:36 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:18:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/2/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPROVED • <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission September 18, 1996 • <br /> Special Meeting Page 4 <br /> designed parking lot, and two letters were <br /> received from the applicant on the seating <br /> capacity confirming that they are requesting <br /> 115 seats in the building. She also noted that <br /> the City has received a number of phone calls <br /> from residents in the neighborhood (she has <br /> received three, the Clerk-Administrator has <br /> also received at least two, and some of the <br /> Council members have also received phone <br /> calls) in opposition of this request. <br /> (It was mentioned at this time that a sign up <br /> sheet was being circulated and any persons in <br /> attendance were asked to sign in). <br /> Director Sheldon proceeded to explain the <br /> changes in the new plan, including the parking <br /> plan in detail. She mentioned that just this <br /> evening she received word from Mr. Bill Diem <br /> • <br /> of Stahl Construction that a modification in the <br /> parking design will be presented which moves <br /> the driveway over to allow for the maneuvering <br /> of emergency vehicles. <br /> Ms. Sheldon explained that in the report she <br /> had gone step by step through the criteria and <br /> felt that there were a couple of areas where <br /> the criteria was not met: the character of the <br /> development and whether it fits into the <br /> character of the neighborhood, noting that the • <br /> proposed structure will be a story and a half <br /> with the wall heights being 13-16 feet and, if <br /> adding in the roof, will go from 26.5 to 29 feet <br /> in height. She added that typically a home in <br /> this neighborhood is one story (in the range of <br /> 15-16 in height) and the footprint is 2,054 <br /> square feet which is typically larger than the <br /> average home. The other issue involved the <br /> amount of buffering and it was noted that the <br /> Code does not specifically address this issue <br /> and what is "adequate" buffering for this • <br /> request. She added that staff has looked, as a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.