My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-06-1996
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-06-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 3:22:02 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 2:29:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/6/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission November 6, 1996 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> Director Sheldo• <br /> n stated this item indicates that <br /> the variance cannot stand by itself. It was then <br /> recommended that item 7 be added as a <br /> ftv <br /> "whereas" instead. :: <br /> v}.y <br /> 7 ayes <br /> 0 nays "`'?; <br /> �>{�����~�IQt��.n Carried <br /> Director Sheldon ex lain zy >< > :>:z < ; <br /> p d that the second :� <br /> art of <br /> ti tit <br /> • <br /> the r <br /> e uest pert'''. <br /> to the si na :::b <br /> e for <br /> p ..+, <br /> the site. She noted that there have been some =<>r' <br /> changes in the proposal since the last Planning '`ti�'>� �`�� ��k'-ii <br /> Commission meeting. (At this time Director ' <'< '' `{>{>:.; <br /> niiiiiiiiiMitik .0 <br /> Sheldon distributed pictures of four other `.:<: <br /> centers owned by the applicant showing <br /> exam les \NI `} <br /> p of signage). She ex lained that th <>'<' " ., "`z ':::<:::::: ::} <br /> P <br /> last time <br /> this ite <br /> m was <br /> before <br /> the Pl <br /> anni <br /> n� <br /> Commission thea licant was ro osi:`''`'a <br /> Pp P p �� <br /> .,..,4"- <br /> sign n 75 f <br /> eet h' <br /> i hand <br /> 80 <br /> Osquare <br /> fe <br /> �:are <br /> 9 9 <br /> q <br /> el.� a <br /> which they felt was needed so the shopping '`"::'"`' ` <br /> • center name and tenant names. ld appear } <br /> above the bridge. She explain `that the <br /> PlanningCommission requested information <br /> regarding ti w much of:the s.i'.{``Yc would' ow <br /> above the'1 ' a and<�t ow the ridge <br /> w `" `> ''- <br /> look to e` l r t::.travel ng or I : :hwa 10. <br /> Director explainedP <br /> le City sgin.17...d a <br /> study on how` ti h 'sign wet ' ve to be to <br /> appear ovt 'It~:a distance which a <br /> motorist: c uld travel i'n 10 econds at 50 mph. <br /> (Tenear t. r...nds was con Bred the amount of <br /> time<tt would take a m o It to decide to slow <br /> and'turn into the shopping center.) The study <br /> 'ued that if you are`765 feet back from Long <br /> Lake Road and theisign is placed in the area <br /> . : _by the.pplicant, then the bridge will <br /> ciit .`feet of the sign and the sign will <br /> shote above the bridge railing from 52 feet <br /> upwards. She went on to explained that on a <br /> 75 foot high sign, 23 feet would show above the <br /> bridge railing and you would only see the <br /> center identification part of the sign. She <br /> informed the Commission that the applicant is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.