Laserfiche WebLink
� �� . �. ��: ' � � � . . � ���. <br />;� � - •: <br />`�,� - �1 1 ••. <br />� _ ,� : <br />•�i�'. 'R __" � ��`-�,- -� "` . � ..#�l . s y � , i r ` � <br />M�. �treeter commented, regarding ltem 2 of the r�soluti�n, that a( gh they <br />have submitted a brick desigr� fc�r the sign, h� presume� tF:��h�;, �� ign �nrould <br />be a deearative b�ock wsiih b�°ick trim ar�d indicat th�t ����� <br />� ���.��n architecfi <br />th�t reco€°nmends a cert�ir� design fc�r the si <br />regarding th� required berm �nd landscapir <br />ir�stail tre�s ar�ur�d the proposed signage i; <br />may deter atfer�tion from the signag�. He � <br />havr� the optlon to use brick and decorativ�; <br />the design specified by their architect. Fie � <br />coiar for �he sigr� tex�; however, if a major t� <br />th�ir natior��! advertising theme, ihey woui� <br />CornmessEOner M��I�r asked fhe ap� <br />�hai are heid �t the c�r�ter would�.��� <br />wauld be r�a reader baards on.,��'si <br />adverQised fihis way. : tt`� <br />�oe�missioner r <br />�tr�eter indicated <br />arch��ect �o�d appr� <br />::�:_;>::, <br />.....:`` <br />.a:�: :: :2 `: � .Yt 7 <br />\\`\J �. �� <br />��'�:� WaS�� <br />`.;:;:<::<.;:,. <br />raf t�:�����`..:...11 �he <br />�z:,.;:� :.:.;�:... <br />tenar�f�:��;� r� <br />nam�,.�;������ <br />::;z,�; »»>,>::::::;:::>:>:;<::<::�;� <br />Cs�tii��i����� <br />�,.,. :;::�:.::;�; <br />�me ihen the�;� <br />Commission di�:'� <br />r. Str��;:��.�1�d q�estior <br />�.:.:.<..>;..<:�: . <br />said f���;���ar�ment to� <br />�r�ft <br />`�'�o <br />tµ .; .�. �� ���1�:<.y.;':�,us �� <br />>. <br />� requestir'�n ;"��;��' <br />��._ ��A��� <br />bi�ck in acco � -..,w; � with <br />�.that they have a uniform <br />`��� � differeni cofor d�e fio <br />m,;����a�d�te iheir request. <br />yr� simil�r events <br />r replied �hat fihere <br />would rtot be <br />reei � o the I..� ���caping they are proposing. M�o <br />�d �`� ing w�f be designed by iheir in-house <br />.\\Uh\ <br />�y our � . . , .. �1�. ' h <br />' fk <br />� �, � �, ° -�;� -.t-_�� <br />�. . � �,� <br />�.. ___.. <br />:',u� with item 4 in fihe resolution �v„f�+ere�is s�ate� th�t 1/2 <br />,;� '�or �oording and indicated tiia� same of the m�jor <br />��a;.�,�;,�w; <br />�� , even if ii means shrir�king the I�tfering for the <br />f:'��ctor Sheidon added that if the Planning <br />�ri�in portion af the sign area to be �sed for the cente�s <br />e�ed to specify that in the resolu�ion. The f�lanning <br />fihe w�rding tt�at would be appropri�te for the resofution. <br />Director Shei�i� explained to the Planning Commission that the fo�r�h sign was <br />not include �� the varianee requ�si because she fe(4 it was not needed to <br />� <br />���� '`��ie effect of the brid e artd wart#ed t� ma6ce it clear that fihe Plan�ing <br />:..�.;,., �t;�:. 9 <br />����w�;-y:- <br />;'�,�tcan v�ould not be taking action on the �ourth sign ev�n though it was <br />��� r�n �he diagram subr�itted by the app{icant. <br />��e St�°e�ter �gairt referred io the it�m in i�re r�soiution regarding uniforr� color <br />�nd reque�ied fhaf fhis ifern be retr�oved from the resol�ation in order to <br />accorrir�oda�e fuiure r�q�aests from tena�ts. �ornrnE�s�or�e� �ber� expre�s�d <br />his opposi�iart �ith t�e er�ction of t�es� type of signs lisiing te�ant n�mes a�d <br />