Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />471-97: O'Neil Property <br />March 8, 1997 <br />Page 6 <br />includes a r�umber of pol�cies re�arding 6uffering bet�vee� Ia.nd uses. These hav� been <br />included in Appendices 1 and 2. <br />2. Inconsistencv between Comp Plan and Zoning: The designation for approximately 17 <br />acres of the O'1Veil property is inconsistent with the zonirig in tern�s of use (commercial <br />versus residentiai). According to State law, zoning %akes precedence over comprehensive <br />plan designations. Unless the zoning is changed. from commercial to residential, the most <br />likely use of th� 17 acres is comm�rcial. Tt is to be expected that the property owner <br />wo�ald resist action �o change �he zotung from comrnercial io residential. <br />3. Suitability for Sin�le F'amily Residential: There is some question whether it is appropriate <br />io put single family residential adjacent �o Highway 10. If a single family residential <br />development were built, it is likeIy that it would be "walled o�' from the highway tocreat� <br />a liveable environment. The result would be bIank face or dead spoi in the middle of the <br />"community center" district and along the highway. <br />4. Value as Commercia.l PropertX: The O'Neil parcel is prime commercial property with its <br />frontage along the Highway 10, given the pretnium placed on visibility by high volumes of <br />traffic by commercial uses, and the availabiiity of access from an arterial highway and the <br />I-35 corridor. The market for neighborhood or commun[ty retail commercial is weak, as <br />evidenced by the vacancies in the IViounds View Square Shopping Center and Silver View <br />Pla.za and as reported in a rec�nt market stzady by Towle Real Estate for the Highway 10 <br />corridor in Mounds View. This application indicates #hat there is maricet inierest in ihe <br />groperty �or specialty commercial development. <br />Effect on City's Tax Base: <br />■ If the property were develop�d as single family residential, it would cost the City <br />more in services than it will generate in revenue. If it were developed as <br />commerciat it would generate more revenue than it wilI cost in senrices. <br />� When looking at the overail picture, ihe City has a very limited amount of iand irz <br />commercial zoning or commercial uses (3.9% in 1990), and an extensive amouni <br />of i�nd in single family residential {45.1% in 1990): One possible goal af land use <br />planning is to balance the types of land uses to creat� a sustainable economy and a <br />reasonable level of tax�s for services. Comm�rcial uses gay more property ta�Yes <br />than does single famity residential dev�lopment. Commercial uses which at�ract <br />customers from a wider a.rea than the City's boundaries import dollars, and may <br />cr�at� additional spending at other M[ounds View busines�es such as restaurants. <br />They may prompt additional comm�rcial developtnent which also adds to the tax <br />base. <br />