04-02-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 Mounds View Planning Commission March 19, 1997 Agenda Meeting Page 11 Henry Ruggles, 2629 Lake Court Drive, requested more information on where the ingress/egress will be for Parcel A and expressed his concern regarding short- cuts that may occur using Mounds View Drive and hoped it would be.; igned to �zzz� accommodate anything that is developed there. Director 81 on• ted out on the map that the proposed access point for Parce lA does i`µ,. with Mounds alz�, �xzizuz.zzii;:.:...a AK" ,zazzr. wzzzz View Drive. : K" . .z i �,z5% ii%i.%zziir.z t.,. or iztiizzz:>.z`i z;iz ;. Mike Weber, 2512 County Road H2, inform, #'the Corr fssio that t one cezzz •z`` �fiiz`r.:•;:gizik?ii#zz the residents who did not accept an offer froV,.a Deoper. He Neat he does not like the plan at all and is conceri" :. . . � he traffic, teenilems and drainage control. He believes that their rfitiMMRed is residential and that the plan is not good for the area and that the the4prntriArkshould listen to the concerns of the people of Mounds View. 47"?. . l „rzxi}VER ., Joe Beaton, representing Louise OEI 1 i •.essed the dience explaining that Louise O'Neil, who is 82 years old S o`w ed t.•.��``.:;proper y'or over thirty years. zzizizz#...z:i..z:z z, zzz. He understands that everyone 1d like. `• `i Eback yard, but the property is a great tax burden#her. .. payz } imately $60,000 in property . taxes each year on this lan& ie corr�ented tt 'the question is not if there is going to be a developm0pfthis ROperty, b jt is a question of who is going to develop it and how it is.: g to be` evelopnd when. He indicated that they ��;i;;zzzi� ;z�,, have.had numerousoffr's over tt ` tears for this property with quality and Viz, r4 is. ..zi s is.w,�zzz int nos • lity deve l-1e expl €, Mrs. O'Neil has delayed this decision as Io > he cou dr n Mr. A i'iony came to them, they found that he is a de�'�•`�"�O h a ste ing `" cation offering a very high quality product and hopes that the c f r Pity will ici z>his project. ' .!i;zz::>:;zzzzzz>:::z Now- .,:0101.111•14., .z zzi.,<-�<�:�- Ste' Mitfe i � earview Avenue, wanted to know who paid for the traffic and 4��z,.e:iii :,.: :"h u.. titer-studieten Sheldon indicated that the traffic studywas-administered 2 zz:.w. :•ntAKLtzy _ �i; �by the City and " by the Developer and the market study was submitted by All the Developer.hi r.smith responded by saying that they only paid for the traffic A 1;; study so the C t could use their traffic engineer in order to give an unbiased •.•iiia" •decision ba `on the studies already conducted for Highway 10. Mr. Miller ` M11 dicateda't he is not asking that the property not be sold, but that the City izz iiil�;zzz:.. ;13,....,.`�,".`,�.." urther what will be developed on that site. He added that he does not ' b 'n opportunity for a buy-out and must stay and live with this project, which is .zz. part of his opposition. Russ Nordstrom, 2536 County Road H2, wanted to inform the audience that he . has opted not to accept the buy-out offer from the Developer, although it was a good offer and believes it was done it good faith. He feels that there are a lot of