My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Resolution 91-83
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Planning Commission Resolution 91-83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 5:26:19 PM
Creation date
7/31/2018 5:26:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br />RESOLUTION NO. 91-83 <br />i. <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING A REZONING AND GRANTING <br />VARIANCES FOR PLANNING CASE 131-83 <br />WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Mr. <br />Gordon Bayerkohler, owner of property located at 7801 Sunnyside <br />Road, to convert the existing four unit residential building <br />located on this property to an office building; and <br />WHEREAS, this proposal requires a rezoning of the property. <br />from R-3, Medium Density Residential to B-2, Limited Business <br />District; and <br />WHEREAS, the proposed conversion to an office building <br />also requires a building side yard setback variance and reduced <br />number of parking spaces variance; and <br />WHEREAS, notices of the Planning Commission informational <br />meeting were sent to all property owners who reside on Sunnyside <br />Road between Highway 10 and Hillview Road in addition to being <br />posted in the two apartment buildings immediately east of this <br />existing fourplex; and <br />WHEREAS, no response was received from any of these <br />residents concerning this proposal; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission identifies no negative <br />impacts on the surrounding property as a result of the proposed <br />rezoning to B-2; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request <br />for a building side yard setback variance on the east side of the <br />property; and <br />WHEREAS, this side yard setback variance is justified <br />since the proposed use of the building is not creating the need <br />for this variance; a continuation of the non -conforming setback <br />is being requested since the setback for both the existing use <br />and proposed use do not meet minimum Zoning Code requirements; <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has also reviewed the <br />request for a variance of two parking spaces; and <br />WHEREAS, in order to preserve the natural tree/shrub <br />buffer, green space, and the drainage of the site, a two <br />VOR.'. 9 P g - parking <br />.'. space variance is needed; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.