Laserfiche WebLink
-Apr-11-97 09: 57A Howard Sheldon 1-714-779-6612 P.05 <br /> .PR-10-97 TRU 14: 54 SRF ?AI NV. <br /> Pam Sheldon -4- April 10, 1991 <br /> S <br /> The analysis completed for the draft memorandum was based on the peak hour of the <br /> adjacent street, which is the critical time period for evaluating the ability of the street <br /> system to accommodate the expected traffic levels. Additional information was requested <br /> on the number of trips that would be generated by the movie theater during the peak hour <br /> of the generator (i.e., the theater). Although data was available from the Institute of <br /> Transportation Engineers (ITE) for estimating trip generation for the peak hour.of the <br /> adjacent street,the ITE data for the peak hour of the generator was extremely variable. In <br /> order to develop a better estimate for the peak hour of the generator, a traffic count was <br /> conducted for an existing movie theater complex in the Twin Cities that is similar to the <br /> Carmike Theater being proposed. <br /> • <br /> Counts were taken at an existing 2,300 seat movie theater on a Friday night between <br /> 8:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. This time period was selected to include both the vehicles <br /> exiting from movies that had started in the 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. slot and the vehicles <br /> entering for movies that would be starting in the 8:30 to 10:00 p.m. time slot. Friday <br /> night was selected because poor weather was expected on the Saturday of the weekend <br /> that the counts were taken. <br /> . The counts described above resulted in a trip generation rate of 0.15 trips per seat for the <br /> peak hour of the generator. Using this trip rate to estimate trips for the proposed <br /> 2,648-seat movie theater resulted in a peak trip generation of 397 trips per hour. It has <br /> been assumed that the trips generated by the office buildings during the peak hour of the <br /> movie theater trip generation would be negligible. <br /> TRIP ASSIGNMENT <br /> The assignment of site-generated trips to the street system was originally based on the <br /> distribution of existing traffic volumes on the streets. This is typically the method used <br /> for small traffic studies. Comments made at the Planning Commission meeting indicated <br /> that the assumed direction of approach was not consistcnt with travel patterns observed <br /> by residents in the area. Consequently a more detailed analysis, usually used for more <br /> complex traffic studies, was used to refine the assumed direction of approach. For this <br /> analysis, the Metropolitan Council's regional travel forecasting model was used to assign <br /> site generated trips to the street system. The resulting direction of approach, shown in <br /> Figure 1, indicates that more of the site generated trips would be destined to the south and <br /> southwest on County Road H-2 and Long Lake Road them assumed previously. <br /> Figure 2 shows the number of site-generated trips that would be added to Long Lake <br /> Road and County Road H-2 by the proposed project on a daily basis (theater and office), <br /> S during the peak hour of the adjacent street (theater and office trips), and during the peak <br /> hour of the generator (theater only, office trips would be negligible). The proposed <br /> development would result in increases of between eight and eleven percent over existing <br /> daily traffic volumes on County Road H-2 and between seven and sixteen percent on <br /> Long Lake Road. <br />