04-16-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 Regular Meeting Page 13 that a developer had it down-zoned to a B-2 for a proposed book store. He added that when the development did not occur, the zoning was left B-2. Mr. Black commented that he appreciated the Planning Commission's review a, consideration of this proposal. He added that the applicant Akin •. : •rtable with the Planning Commission's overriding concern asitrelate C: 2 t`-s station and the buffer. He indicated that, at the present time pe ite�''irf"�;'`: .Y'Y' ' e proposed are not negotiable. He realized that this was only ncept re., ; ::.* :�w t, -t during t, "s• development stage there would be additional ues to 4 ddre r`2µ::,mor:.< 'J thorough review by both the Planning Com on a x ity Coun:.i: x that the Planning Commission, at their next meet N'`'`'1' >-f'.e a recommen• -a# f: • the Council so that they can present their proposi ,is , ouncil's comments and A\ 2\.2222.. review so that they could either come back a : ` ction with a different plan or proceed with the development stage. '1?iz::rrx2 Commissioner Brasaemle proposes te0 repare t %ation of both approval and denial for their next meeting. . ae•.. d that t"aff complete as much information in the PUD documents ossfbrete"`` '. :e<# annin Commission could p �� 9 flu in the blanks at their next ming. .� 2x„t;, ic; •u`sww INIK • ..:�ta:2k mot 2µ4` % Chair Peterson asked tlicarince thad expressed no room for negotiation, if the Planr* Com ` on wo be looking at the same proposal at their pext meetingOkAld theret:aan, „$anges made to the proposal. Mr. Black info rthe Co, ,.: k that ast t oceeded into the development stage, they ''''''''':.'14':•... ive f ir1t e e son tt h`ai�`chitectural style of the buildings, landscaping, traM'`.2`,„,.:., ` ,22:22222 2:222�:^.42 r ._,„ion on *ztorm water quantity and quality control and NURP pond •d ` .,t adde t at erences between the Planning Commission and the applicant < r^ art. E mmented that the Planning Commission was su "St1n"�`e*aL of the gas station which was something that they would not ,,,,..‹.0sider at-th s -advised-the_Commission_thattheissues-regarding-too _ _ ti" nnuch developmen t a `the site or the impact on the wetland could not or would not 2222h be changed before heir next meeting. '.sioner`, 4dks left the meeting at 10:10 p.m. 7. Staff Report/Information Items a. Director Sheldon reminded the Commission that the SRF Consulting Highway 10, • Area 9 Report would be presented at the City Council meeting Monday evening.