My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
04-16-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:19:35 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 4:51:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/16/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 <br /> • Special Agenda Meeting Page 3 <br /> traffic study and indicated that there is a supplemental study to what had already <br /> been done and that the information would be available on April 16th. The study <br /> would) include what happens during theater peak time and what woul4-:hr land <br /> uses would generate for traffic. She further addressed thes;:: in•:"! es as <br /> outlined in the staff report. Copies of the Staff Report were {."s ed to the <br /> audience. ,l � . $ s r <br /> Tom Emster, 2504 County Road H2, inquir�1 why the.; cifi ., ens .- <br /> chosen for the report. Mr. Wendell Smith resided t ti g tha�z $? {.g <br /> to present as much information as possible sr t*.eYe�eryone can ma '`'.-:: : <br /> objective decision. He indicated that he will doO 1 this weekend at arca <br /> theaters if needed. 4��``"'� ..........�.. <br /> Mr. Smith continued by stating that requiring:them to btiagelpe 1:4 ratio for <br /> parking requirements may be overkill4.0iip;that theiiission not <br /> concentrate on the worst possible,*ridifoli#0164pok atiiit the information for an <br /> objective decision. m`w.. .. ` <br /> 2.` <br /> • <br /> Chair Peterson asked if thee; fudy er is had gva public transportation avarra rs. <br /> Mr. Smith was notquite .rebut in. ted the.e could find that out. From a <br /> conceptual standpoint,:,"g Smith sated t t they could meet the 1:4 raf<<,>. <br /> ....' s>k altdm <br /> IP <br /> Tontaster, 25 >.: -"nty Road expressed his concern with too mr Rrh <br /> p� envir ,: .t-asons. <br /> Mr. Sirisort <br /> on to .c : nature of small screens and their turnover rate <br /> vvv v4...v A vvvvvv . <br /> and ad a profits a theater business were the concessions and that <br /> they*e-very m0t to the viability of the theater. Commissioner Steven o <br /> z dedthatthe :..•, r Township-theaters were nota-good-example-hec oso -- <br /> they do a poor swaggering movie start times. He expressed that he would like <br /> O. assurances thatese staggered times will take place. Commissioner Brasaemle <br /> added that trate concerns are a result of grouped start times. A resident raised a <br /> � i�%z •ii�w <br /> ,�. `' concern that a wouldn't want the times too staggered in case the group we were <br /> `:``-` with wou iike to see different movies. <br /> '<Z € ir Sheldon asked the Planning Commission for guidance regarding the <br /> County Road H2 buffer issue, whether it should be left in its natural state, add <br /> things to it, or change it into a more manicured landscape buffer. She asked what <br /> would happen if the office buildings are not built right away and should the trees be <br /> • left until the office buildings are started. Director Sheldon continued her discussion <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.