Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 • <br /> Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> about the Highway 10 study that was done for this area. Economic Development <br /> Director Bennett explained that a study was conducted, with public input, and the <br /> results of the study would be presented at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, Apritlyth at City <br /> Hall. She indicated that she had not seen the final draft of t.. studut that it did <br /> mark that corner as an impulse corner and that one of the., *moons from the <br /> consultant was that it should be packaged as a. ed un ` '. ment so that <br /> design elements could be carried throughout et evelopm*** aving spot f: <br /> development on the site. Mr. Ruggles expre d that herd n €k �`at the;,, <br /> YK� ,Y.` >:Y:YYYY:.;.Y.Y,`;YY>YY:� •YYYYYYY. <br /> Planning Commission could make a decision hout.#tt seeing thei softs ie <br /> study that would be presented Monday even ;Chair Peterson corfOtpethat it <br /> would be premature to take action this evening nd mented that there are <br /> manydetails to be worked out. Y YmligY>Yr <br /> µ ,YY.YY•,Y:..•:•Y. <br /> George Winiecki, WIN Agency, 2732 I ii way 10, ii i e <br /> . e Commission <br /> that, in the past, he had discussed de 'Y .. .:of this s :<< hi the City and that <br /> the City had indicated that they wo1rkbµ� .planned#unit development for <br /> the site. He too stated that this.<.was wha h .::.. .••. in <br /> < ::. <br /> Chair Peterson asked thqkw Planng Commissioners give their overall direction ill <br /> regarding this project. l-Wpirted b indicating hat he had some concerns with the <br /> total quantity being buitt#ii the sit ,.'He indeed that the uses are acceptable, <br /> except that he is conceed with } mbe'of car washes and gas stations in <br /> Ma s View aro es�.ted to recommend that part of the project. <br /> ..kYYY:�: •Ye�YYYY.Yz ``:Y```YY„.`,.`YYY...Y� » •., <br /> �YYYYY.YY YY .Y tia Y�Y� �^^.. <br /> Co " er Obert''exe sed his concern with the architectural integrity of the <br /> projectiteves tha } ue needs further review. He added that he would <br /> like to s t `: wits of the fudy presented Monday evening because he believes <br /> 4'•Ztt�sYYYY? \:Y2?#Y'YYYY..Y�,Y•.k.� •:::.Y� <br /> this would'`pf fi al roleY'in his decision making for the development of the <br /> Y\4�. <br /> ;c mdor H t l ncemed with the local residents and th traffic problems <br /> Om <br /> ;v they may expen ftMlbn Silver Lake Road. He added that, as a resident of <br /> <F Mounds View, t `making the commercial corridor pleasant and pleasing, it would <br /> AN increase property values and, therefore, the City Council would not have to <br /> :4 t = artificially ra.irproperty taxes. <br /> omIss1oner Johnston concurred with Commissioner Obert that the <br /> ::YYY..:.. `: rn ssion needs to wait to hear the results of the corridor study. Commissioner <br /> Johnston is also concerned with the amount of building within the wetland buffer <br /> zone and its current delineation. He admitted that, at present, he thought the <br /> project needed to be scaled back. He realizes that there are a lot of gas stations <br /> and car washes in the area, but if that was what the study recommended, he would • <br />