05-21-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 Regular Meeting Page 13 that a developer had it down-zoned to a B-2 for a proposed book store. He added that when the development did not occur, the zoning was left B-2. Mr. Black commented that he appreciated the Planning Commission's review a:: r� consideration of this proposal. He added that the applicant,is Inco bitable with the Planning Commission's overriding concern as't relategi . >gas station and the buffer. He indicated that, at the present time; ,ie item : . eve proposed are ' not negotiable. He realized that this was only. �:"• ncept re Lta `';'..-.at during tI e. development stage there would be additionalt�'$ ues to taddrG$ ?g -ati more r>y` cL ; : hat thorough review by both the Planning Comm n amity Counarith� tip:,:. �.�#' ��>?>•'•�'iz:�t�#:«:c the Planning Commission, at their next meett rflat' a recommends td'the Council so that they can present their proposal# rt Council's comments and review so that they could either come back aftc #caption with a different plan or proceed with the development stage. >ei k: Commissioner Brasaemle proposed€akir .• repare pion of both approval and denial for their next meeting. H atSo . ed that: ' aff complete as much information in the PUD documeregs posy i' �a #fanning Commission could fil in the blanks at their next m. in "�`:kli :; ."""` • 4.4 •:... ::: t:. Chair Peterson asked taw: • lican ince thy.``had expressed no room for negotiation, if the PlanrIrCommtkon wont be looking at the same proposal at their.pp ext meeting`s `#` Id there YaRt , ahges made to the proposal. Mr. Black inf< the cam), s; that a t t ceeded into the development stage, they " ive f it a.` its on the'"architectural style of the buildings, landscaping, tra g .. ion ori 'storm water quantity and quality control and NURP and`d legg `# t addenta rences between the Planning Commission and the applica it art. l-Ie itmented that the Planning Commission was su eetfing`4`''"Yr�tr1$ of the gas station which was something that they would not "fisider-at- hid1 ``" dvised-the-Commission-thatthe-issues-regarding-too - �ii much developmentaiPthe site or the impact on the wetland could not or would not Azt.4:* be changed befe their next meeting. .:1:s1 4.1 ••4Vl`•k Aa Mal AV ¢i i sinner. g`ks left the meeting at 10:10 p.m. vammaymmw 7. Staff Report/Information Items a. Director Sheldon reminded the Commission that the SRF Consulting Highway 10, • Area 9 Report would be presented at the City Council meeting Monday evening.