Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 <br /> 411 <br /> Special Agenda Meeting Page 6 <br /> Commissioner Miller inquired if there would be access to the theater parking from <br /> Donatelle's. Mr. Smith indicated that they are very open to the idea, either by <br /> walkway or vehicle, and indicated that he has talked with Mr. Donatelle vho is also <br /> open to the idea. •i`; -Mir <br /> 04. <br /> Tom Emster, 2504 CountyRoad H2, comment at thi�t� n is the best <br /> possible for this particular and does not wa`'the site �`"��`�` " •• ,,,,, <br /> � :�� 'r�d from whal%�• <br /> had been resented. : "` ;: ;�a ,, .,,,v <br /> Fz...x k ' �e"'�z+`...iw'iz izi iia:,zY,##V <br /> Chair Peterson commented that the Police Do .`:......... nt has recomn ; +that <br /> the City try to get a full signalized intersection ' `„ ;aps realign Edgewood Drive <br /> to join the site at a 90 degree angle. Mr. Smit d ttthe study would <br /> probably indicate that the project could be Ole wit�"1 :nal. However, they <br /> would prefer to have one installed. He ad,;, ,;,:•,that they t1 City to work with <br /> MnDOT but that they need a decision:: µ:, the C `. that they can move <br /> forward with the development stage£ bi f eed in Working with MnDOT. <br /> A resident indicated that he like"the theater r'```'"'��TA"' <br /> does not like the trafficva.City tID <br /> e, • <br /> Chair Peterson sugge `` <br /> . that t:: go ove ; e issues that still need discussion. <br /> They commented that Compt� ,.1t'�`is out-of-date and wondered if it <br /> sh.,<;4 a amend, .. indicat ,S does not think we could do much better <br /> ttOliatic for forlffOlatommisia`ner Stevenson commented that he has been <br /> on` : g : < <br /> ay 10`T e�for the last five years and they saw the only <br /> devel�"":.,.."itt this sliI: '•because of the mix of zones. He added that the <br /> Comp be recite. <br /> AP) ''Vjilatrak\s„ <br /> tom Emt , - ..;:;•,`x`�.` y—R H2, indicated-that he has looked atthe old <br /> . >�Lomp Plan and itggest that the area wasn't to be high impact development. <br /> Commissioner AL <br /> Brasaemle added that certainly a PUD will give the City more <br /> � ,mcontrol as f � <br /> as development. Commissioner Obert asked what happens when <br /> `i ` l, eCo ,lan <br /> is redone. Would they take into account the possibilty for rezoning <br /> Ileigitiggiffty and would it remain the current zoning even if it is developed as a <br /> INWHe also inquired if it is approved as a PUD, would it be coordinated into the <br /> revised Comp Plan as such? Director Sheldon responded by saying that the <br /> existing zoning and the Comp Plan do not match. The Planning Commission could <br /> proceed to make a recommendation on the zoning alone and not touch the Comp <br /> Plan. She added that what regulates the use of the parcel is the zoning and • <br /> Minnesota does not have a requirement that you have to have consistency <br />