Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 2, 1997 • <br /> Special Agenda Meeting Page 8 <br /> The Commission went on to briefly discuss the wetland buffer and encroachment of <br /> the project into the buffer and they indicated that this is not an issue. <br /> .a. <br /> Chair Peterson inquired about reconstruction of County Road RqtkH2.ttitecessary. <br /> Director Sheldon responded that they do not expect that th;, eI : ttf traffic would <br /> trigger reconstruction. A resident expressed hiss oncem*filMilg for <br /> reconstruction due to increased traffic flows fgti f is type ofvp�fi hector .: <br /> Sheldon informed the Commission that there:10 plans tot toenl e 1.2<to}.be <br /> reconstructed in the year 2000. `. ;w � `kt`a``�,,,kk;,,~<k i§ `k~; <br /> z?k:a� kk ..::;` :rig%..i,: <br /> $ k k on CountyRoad H2 if the <br /> kqeilw <br /> The Commission talked briefly about installing?+'„``;`.k> �.� <br /> increased traffic, as a result of this project, po014 risk to pedestrians, but <br /> agreed that the impact would probably be in ftJnificant.>;h continued with their <br /> �t k:a ::kk kk:'tk <br /> discussion regarding sidewalks along Higt way 10, traf : .2` rid installing a <br /> boardwalk around the wetland. Mr. $ # tented that tkItifieJay Anthony <br /> provided a letter to the City indicatipsif# l ing to Ofk with the City <br /> regarding trails and walkways. i actor S e t the Commission that the <br /> •}« � <:� �``Z�`�,`Y`Y',`Y,A`2ft``.`:J<2ki^.kk`.`:'.'k�'� <br /> City has existing wetland creditsfrom tlgolf Instruction that possibly <br /> could be used if a walkway:.,0`<,0>,"0 oardw: k infring i'into the wetland, but they would 111 <br /> need to find out if this pro e,t>, voulc a prion ruse for the credits. <br /> .4S3ml 0 <br /> ITO Mk The ommission dic that th. i . sue would be dealt with at a later date. <br /> M,r. h reass, n that theywtt eat the sign criteria and added that they <br /> a <is `i'` nng to 1401 nument rgn with a reader board showing movies and <br /> star • : :..::k: •., <br /> Chair Petersonncluder t the Planning Commission is in favor of what has <br /> Rife `g'tx but at no` ction would be taken this evening since it was a <br /> .<< scussion me'- f :,{° :a ed t e Commission What was their generalflingand <br /> At;direction of this:Wm*: <br /> Mr. Smith asked if the Commission could take a straw vote so that he has an idea <br /> <l▪ ,, of their feelitegarding the project. Other than traffic concerns that need to be <br /> ▪: tY` .:;:i.:§.:.: <br /> = xxkx{ korked.ct :� �nd given other potential uses for the site, all Commissioners <br /> 'k�k''� �' d`that they are in favor of the project. <br /> • <br />