05-21-1997 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 • Special Meeting Page 12 Linda Chase, 5244 Skiba Drive, inquired what would be the length of the fence along County Road H2. Director Sheldon illustrated on the plan where the fence is ' proposed to be located. Y` P. At Sr> Dave Chase, 5244 Skiba Drive, inquired if the 9a showrOfittlil an was a walkway. The Commission indicated that there: ' • ap irtiek and that the intention is not to have foot traffic access to C, i i y Road ,�}y: x n. .:. �:: ti It was the Planning Commission's consensu x include a statemdi D, under item #9, that says the area shown for R> }; :•:.Y .... y buildings shall' taintained as a buffer area with existing vegetation until.,;'S‘,:fi :as the offices are built with the specific dimension to be determined wit ..Yr ent plan stage. Nali Commissioner Brooks left at 9:55 m. w,T;:. ; ;"`Y�r•�` ��;�. .µY.4. '•2`M•M,.•L.•••• �i` Mr. Anthony asked the Commiss } Y.; } YY; ip : 'alx ,�ss w10 be to include the 4.restaurants as part of this PUD bmittalziilD ` on suggested that in the yYr a.� ky,`YY:`.C^yw:.YY}?r . PUD requirements under aliov uses;fir parcri,,• and B, it would read, "restaurant" with a footnot%,would; ate that thalfe size and parking requirements IP would be determined at WON of developent plan stage, and the ability to develop the restaurant:bald be cojrngentbn submittal of a traffic study. She added that this wout ' needeciY` Yt the intersections would continue to .Y'y :YfitYYY..i..t.Y`.`..`.. fur # at an ace a level of ce She commented that the initial concept 4 �,Y g , ti.�� }�.rou fi•f��•••�• d thosses noted, but the plans that were presented .:�`zYziYi`Y`YY, to the E g orhoo dw ' tanning Commission did not show the restaurants, altho i t`'`. d talk Y.• . •Director Sheldon expressed that she is conceped.wah tom„ling re nts at such a late date. She noted, however, that lam'}.Y... ... ,...; � kW sh ai ' • : -ction o this type of use from the neighborhood but she is ;r(Oficerned-w' Y` .:•acts; She-indicated that-if traffrc-numbers-could-be- x"obtained in timatfO a Council meeting, the proposed restaurants could be g' included in the bliir hearing notices. MB ' "'"``4 The Planni Commission explained to Mr. Anthonythat if the restaurants were not iiiw;: ; :v=:ksted or/, PUD at this time, he would need to apply for a PUD amendment in 111 < ` i; evelop them. However, if they were added now, no amendment would be Nr• . NXSary to the PUD unless a use other than a restaurant is desired. Mr. Anthony requested that perhaps other uses, including restaurants, could be added to the PUD at this time. Director Sheldon again expressed concern with informing residents who were present at previous meetings and with the traffic studies that would need to be done. It was the consensus of the applicant and the Planning • Commission to add the restaurant uses to the PUD proposal. The Planning