My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-04-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
06-04-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:20:36 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:11:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/4/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> section. He indicated that he wants to leave a portion of the old driveway for his <br /> basketball hoop. Chair Peterson asked if the new driveway would be paved. The <br /> applicant indicated that eventually it would be, depending upon the fug available. <br /> <i �r <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle inquired about the number of ets in the front of <br /> garage. Planning `ethis requirement <br /> the ara e. Associate Ericson indicat.`"`;, at hey� �7' <br /> applies only to the front of the garage, not then �`. 4..0 bakxiie:P;} <br /> Commissioner Miller inquired as to the req ent ;, improved AV 4:11With ARP <br /> swfax - en <br /> ` <br /> building a new garage. Mr. Ericson comme > :‘:•ur Code states }... ;arkin <br /> surfaces (i.e., driveways) must be improved. ;. .; % Director Sheldon added <br /> that the minimum allowed would be gravel. ';'.:N..p;.#:•e again stated that the <br /> driveway would be done with concrete next -ar w �t " 3;: }:.ds are available. <br /> .:;'.'-;:k., <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Brasaemle to `..Y ,,, fir` `t <br /> a olution -97, "Resolution <br /> Recommending Approval of a Condition a"P €i€ t4:, low anMversized Garage for <br /> e, : t g <br /> Kenneth Newcombe, 7150 Knollwood a Mo ism Case No. 480-97" as <br /> amended. rn„.,:.:6 t., ` <br /> • .4::1'r <br /> z, gew- <br /> , `zz, .,ice <br /> zz <br /> sW <br /> Jerry Blanski, 2933 Wi._ , Dri1 ,`ti`.{address:``` the Planning Commission stating <br /> that he borders Mr. Nei be's s •erty a<. x hat he has no objection to the size <br /> of th, proposed g-4:::,..Out is •. i_`$, €t the time period in which he has to <br /> co . t- the g max; w t: . Encs:`' 2,. =.td that there is a stipulation with approval <br /> ,tee: ditiont., 8 it that ' `e applicant would have one year to complete <br /> ak <br /> the a� d if it is. ,,t,_,km g<R,:• •leted within that time the applicant must remove the <br /> �zcizr+...;c:,%;z� \cam” zetas **sk'', <br /> garageww :._ for a rte :`•�• 'anal use permit. Mr. Blanski also inquired about <br /> the wid € L: and Apottie garage would be located and wondered how <br /> clos&fitwi to e property lines. Mr. Ericson indicated that the garage <br /> ..' • •• •- .a }.mac ••• • - • - �� ■ •� <br /> AI Commissioner filler indicated that the Code does allow five feet from the <br /> AN property line. .;'. Blanski was concerned with the applicant having to remove <br /> :\ZLY` Et'``t another trees t `build the garage. Mr. Blanski asked that the stipulations again be <br /> llr hated. <br /> w z ,z `i,``,,µz;:`#x` <br /> > r tarnit issioner Miller inquired about the statement contained in the resolution that <br /> refers to "storage of larger than typical equipment" being allowed. Planning <br /> Associate Ericson responded by saying that he believes this statement refers to <br /> riding lawn mowers as opposed to a push mower, but that the statement could be <br /> • changed to be more specific. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.