Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Planning Commission Report <br /> Silver Lake Commons Development Review <br /> Planning Case No. 487-97 <br />• '� June 18, 1997 • <br /> Page 4 <br /> • If flowering crabapple trees are to be used, the species should not be either sparkler or <br /> radiant which are susceptible to disease. (The proposed species on the revised plan is <br /> Spring Snow Crabapple.) <br /> • Pin oaks should be changed to red oak or bicolor oak. <br /> • Regal elm(on revised plan) should be changed to Hackberry. <br /> Staff has a number of concerns with the plantings proposed on the site, which are described below. <br /> We will have a diagram at the meeting to illustrate how we feel the plan needs to be revised. <br /> • Arborvitae edge along Highway 10 was intended to screen the view of the parking lot from <br /> the highway, but it is not very well anchored along the frontage. (Its position appears to be <br /> random and not well-related to the building frontage.) Staff suggests that a grove of trees <br /> be planted between the two existing apartment buildings on either side of the walkway to <br /> get the same effect. Plantings of spruce and crabapple should then be planted on either end <br /> of the Highway 10 frontage and on either side of the driveway, to create"brackets" for that <br /> frontage and identity for the project. <br /> • The lilacs along the south half of the Highway 10 frontage were intended as screening, but <br /> staff is concerned that they will grow so high, they will apppear to create a walled <br /> "compound" look to the development. We would suggest lower growing, dense shrubs that Ili <br /> would provide an edge, keep children off the highway, but also beautify the site. The two <br /> blue spruce in the center would be moved, and additional trees added in groupings at either <br /> end of the frontage. We will be asking the City Forester for some suggestions on types of <br /> shrubs which will do well in this confined space. <br /> • There needs to be some type of fencing along the Highway 10 edge where it abuts the <br /> existing apartment buildings. We have been talking with the applicant about the overall <br /> Highway 10 design theme, and that we expect it to include a bike path and fencing. We <br /> have also talked with MnDOT about entering into a license agreement to allow use of some <br /> of the highway right-of-way. They appear receptive. We are trying to avoid the situation <br /> where we require fencing from the applicant and then later have the City install fencing as <br /> part of the Highway 10 design theme. Staff continues to be concerned, however, that <br /> fencing is needed along this stretch because of the number of children in the existing <br /> apartments and the frequent occasions when children are observed playing in the front lawn <br /> area with no separation from Highway 10. <br /> • The wood fence along the back property line needs to be extended further toward <br /> Eastwood to screen the four parking spaces next to the 4-unit building. <br /> • The arborvitae edge along the chain link fence needs to be anchored on either end with <br /> crabapple trees, or a combination of crabapple and spruce. The City Forester has said that • <br /> the species proposed is suitable for creating a hedge effect and for providing screening. <br />