My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
08-20-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 5:24:23 AM
Creation date
8/1/2018 5:23:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/20/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMNIISSION <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 525-97 <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A. G. ENGEN TO ALLOW FOR A <br /> PERMANENT DRIVEWAY SURFACE WITHIN THE FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD <br /> SETBACK AT 2229 OAKWOOD DRIVE; PLANNING CASE NO. 496-97 <br /> WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the request of <br /> A. G. ENGEN, residing at 2229 Oakwood Drive; and, <br /> WHEREAS, this property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District and is legally <br /> described as: <br /> Lot 26, Block 6, Pinewood Terrace No. 3, <br /> Ramsey County, State of Minnesota <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the following documents associated <br /> with this request: <br /> • 1. Planning Application <br /> 2. Zoning Map <br /> 3. Site Plan <br /> 4. Photographic Documentation <br /> 5. Letter from Applicant <br /> 6. Letter from Neighbor <br /> 7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 525-97 <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant requests a variance to allow for a permanent driveway surface <br /> to be located within the five-foot side yard setback at 2229 Oakwood Drive; and, <br /> WHEREAS, exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to this property over which <br /> the applicant have had no control, in that the existing driveway currently encroaches into the five- <br /> foot setback and installing a new driveway of the same width not in the setback would necessitate <br /> the removal of a fence and significant trees; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the literal interpretation of this Code would deprive the applicant of rights <br /> commonly enjoyed by other property owners in the same district, in that other property owners <br /> are allowed driveways as wide as 35 feet and that because of the mature trees, the applicant <br /> would be unable to retain the driveway at its current width or location if replaced <br /> WHEREAS, granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicants any special <br /> • privilege that is denied by this Title to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same <br /> district in that driveways in single family residential districts may be as wide as 35 feet; and, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.